CGI Ten Year Old Girl "Sweetie" Catches Predators

[Garcia Bronco]

They are sickos, but what did they do that was illegal? Say inapropriate things and expose themselves to a piece of software/application? I don't know if that's good enough to put people in jail.

[Mama Hip Rockets]

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco

They are sickos, but what did they do that was illegal? Say inapropriate things and expose themselves to a piece of software/application? I don't know if that's good enough to put people in jail.

Child pornography is illegal. Child prostitution is illegal. Sex with minors is illegal. As long as there is a demand for it, people will keep producing it. And as long as people keep producing it, they'll have to keep abducting little girls and raping them and beating them until they are forced into pornography/prostitution/sex trafficking.

A common misconception is that this type of stuff only happens overseas, but it's more common than you'd like to believe in our own country. Sex trafficking is the second leading criminal activity in the world, behind only drug trafficking, and our cities are not exempt to it.

[LoneWolf]

Originally Posted by Garcia Bronco

They are sickos, but what did they do that was illegal? Say inapropriate things and expose themselves to a piece of software/application? I don't know if that's good enough to put people in jail.

They don't know that "Sweetie" is a piece of software/application. They believe they are jerking off to a 10 year old and asking her to take her clothes off and play with herself. You don't think that is enough to put people in jail?

[BigRichard]

Originally Posted by LoneWolf

They don't know that "Sweetie" is a piece of software/application. They believe they are jerking off to a 10 year old and asking her to take her clothes off and play with herself. You don't think that is enough to put people in jail?

I think it is sick as well but they don't allow a guy to walk if he thinks a girl is 18 when she is 16 so shouldn't the opposite also be true?

I just don't think they can convict on this alone.

[listopencil]

Originally Posted by BigRichard

I think it is sick as well but they don't allow a guy to walk if he thinks a girl is 18 when she is 16 so shouldn't the opposite also be true?

I just don't think they can convict on this alone.

In the video "Sweetie" is identified as a 10 year old girl. The freaks hit the bait like starving fish. This wasn't a case of a misunderstanding the target's age.

[LoneWolf]

Originally Posted by BigRichard

I think it is sick as well but they don't allow a guy to walk if he thinks a girl is 18 when she is 16 so shouldn't the opposite also be true?

I just don't think they can convict on this alone.

Did you watch the video with the sound off? "Sweetie" identifies herself as a ten year old girl and then after the chatting starts she reiterates her age so the person on the other end is well aware of her age. That kind of evidence will hold up in any court.