|
|
View Poll Results: Which house would you pick? | |||
Fox Point |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 13.64% |
La Crosse |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 22.73% |
Madison |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 18.18% |
Milwaukee |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1 | 4.55% |
Sheboygan |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 22.73% |
I'd take the $50,000 and stay where I'm at. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 18.18% |
Voters: 22. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#10 |
Seize life. Be an ermine.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: My house
Casino cash: $-462449
![]() |
This is a tough one for me. Wisconsin has much better choices than I was expecting.
#1 - La Crosse - Who am I kidding? I've always wanted a turret. The location isn't very good (although the street itself is amazing), and the town doesn't seem to have that much to offer, but who am I kidding? That place is a freaking castle, and I want a castle. #2 - Fox Point - Great location on Lake Michigan and great house. It's walking distance from a Panda Express, too. This is an awesome house and almost knocked off #1. #3 - Madison - The location on the lake is nice and the house is cool, although somewhat small for this price range. I'm not against this house at all. #4 - Milwaukee - I'd like being in a city and it's got a great location near the university, but its location on the street doesn't befit its status. The house itself is nice, but not a blockbuster. #5 - Sheboygan/Plymouth - I loved the house and the setting seems nice, but once I zoomed out and looked at the location, I marked it down considerably. You're driving everywhere if you live here, and it's not in a location with notable urban or rural features.
__________________
Active fan of the greatest team in NFL history. |
Posts: 145,262
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|