01-19-2017, 04:01 PM
|
#11
|
Mostly Ignored
Join Date: Jul 2013
Casino cash: $8419985
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rain Man
At some point I'm going to do a study of the coverage and shows on NFL Network. I can understand spending more time covering the teams that have won more, so that wouldn't be my thesis question. My hypothesis is that they cover some teams disproportionately to their record.
For example, they had a nice series a while back that was their lists of the top ten Cowboy, top ten Raiders, etc. I thought it would be nice to see the top ten on each team in their opinion. But they only did it for a handful of teams and then stopped. Looking at the list, they covered the Cowboys, Raiders, Steelers, Packers, 49ers, and Giants. Oh, and Patriots. I missed that one in my scan.
They've done 129 episodes of "Top Ten", and in that time they've covered six teams. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NFL_Top_10 Seriously? You've done a list of the top ten players named Steve and the top ten draft-day moments and the top ten things you loved about Tim Tebow, and you haven't thought to do the top ten players for 25 of the league's 32 teams? Really?
|
Not to mention, when they did the Top 10 TE's, they had Tony G listed somewhere around 6 or 7, I believe.
|
Posts: 18,097
|
|