Ty Law

[Wallcrawler]

Well, whats the general opinion of Ty Law now that we have seen him in action?

I wasnt really impressed, he did have the one pick in the endzone, but overall Law had very little impact on the game.

I dont know if it was Law not being 100% yet, or Trent Green's evisceration of David Barrett all day long that just didnt give Law too many chances at making any plays. Either way, I didnt see too many instances where #24 was in on a play.


In the Quarter that I saw of Surtain, and of Law, who played the whole game...

Surtain > Law

Carl dropped the big money on the right guy.

[Chiefnj]

Originally Posted by Gaz

Law got an INT handed to him [full credit for catching the ball, though] and the Chiefs picked on a rookie [which is the generally-accepted tactic in football].

xoxo~
Gaz
Would not call that a particularly good day.

Barrett's not a rookie. He was a free agent signing.

[StcChief]

Green should have thrown it in the endzone crowd.

[Sam]

Originally Posted by Phobia

That pick in the endzone is on Green's shoulders. Bartee would have intercepted that one, too.

I don't know how much we really challenged Law. I saw him fall down on one out route. That is all I can remember off the top of my head.

Trent threw to the wrong man. Law was so far off his man he was in position for the pick. Trent should have thrown to Law's man at about the 3 on that play.

[Lzen]

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990

You guys are crazy if you think Ty Law would not be a HUGE asset to have on this team come January when we might have to face Brady/Manning/Roethlisberger

I was with you right up until you said Rothlesberger. Can you say OVERRATED?

And btw, we could never afford Law. Do you realize that with the deal he got from the Jets, he's scheduled to make $11 mil next season? I think we'll be alright once Warfield gets back after the bye week.

[Lzen]

Originally Posted by Chiefnj

Barrett's not a rookie. He was a free agent signing.

Yep. According to NFL.com, he played his first 4 seasons with the Cardinals before signing with the Jets as a FA in 2004.

[Wallcrawler]

Yeah, all the jet fans over here prior to the game were touting David Barrett as being able to handle one side of the field, while Law handled the other, due to watching Barrett play for the jets last year, and that the KC offense was going to be rendered ineffective by the Jets defense.

However, those Jets fans failed to realise that they didnt play an offense that was the caliber of KC's offense last year, and for the most part of the season, did not play many great offenses at all during the year.

Barrett was getting torched by Green badly, and even the announcers were making comments about how surprising it was to see Barrett getting picked on and beaten so soundly as many times as he was.

heh.

Nothing like a good reality check.

[dtebbe]

Originally Posted by BSPimpDude

Woah.......Woah........Woah............Woah............Woah............Woah.................Woah.... ........Bartee?!?!? Are you serious? Bartee has yet to recieve his first REAL INT. That's saying alot man.

I dont really know what Trent Green was thinkin on that throw though so I kinda get what you mean, but saying that BARTEE would INT the ball is a bit over the top IMO.

As bad as Bartee is, I think he could have played better that McCleon did on Sunday. They picked Dexter apart.

At least now that we have decent linebackers the safties are back where they are supposed to be, preventing the deep ball.

DT