Rumor: Redskins prepared to offer at least 4 picks for the #2 pick.

[Mr_Tomahawk]

According to John Czarnecki of FOX Sports, the Rams have been getting "weird, uninterested signals" from the Browns on the possibility of trading up two spots to draft Baylor's Robert Griffin III.
RGIII is coming off a dominant Combine, exceeding height expectations, exploding with Vick-like speed, and putting on the most impressive news conference display ESPN's John Clayton has seen in 24 years in Indy. While there's little doubt that Griffin will go off the board at No. 2 overall, we've now seen several reports in two days suggesting the Browns won't be nearly as aggressive as the Redskins. We've also seen at least a handful of national reports warning not to rule out a "mystery" team in the RGIII sweepstakes. Feb 27 - 2:37 AM

http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/...rt-griffin-iii

[Chiefs=Champions]

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk

According to John Czarnecki of FOX Sports, the Rams have been getting "weird, uninterested signals" from the Browns on the possibility of trading up two spots to draft Baylor's Robert Griffin III.
RGIII is coming off a dominant Combine, exceeding height expectations, exploding with Vick-like speed, and putting on the most impressive news conference display ESPN's John Clayton has seen in 24 years in Indy. While there's little doubt that Griffin will go off the board at No. 2 overall, we've now seen several reports in two days suggesting the Browns won't be nearly as aggressive as the Redskins. We've also seen at least a handful of national reports warning not to rule out a "mystery" team in the RGIII sweepstakes. Feb 27 - 2:37 AM

http://www.rotoworld.com/player/nfl/...rt-griffin-iii

Mystery team?

[Steron]

I've said it another thread so I'll say it here.

I don't want Peyton Manning and the huge contract that will come with a 35 year old broken QB. He's only been sacked 231 times in 13 years (You can't really count 2011 as a 0, can you?). Do the math, that's 18 (I rounded up) times a season. We gave up 34 last year. Roughly double. Of course he makes the offensive line better somewhat but do you want to have him getting hit for sacks at twice the rate he's used to? This doesn't even take into consideration plays where the QB gets hit but not sacked. (I admit I didn't look a long time for the QB hit stat). At 35 the body doesn't bounce back like it did at 25.


Keep Orton for two years.
Cut or trade Cassel. I don't care which.
Draft Tannehill at 1.11.
Let Tannehill and Stanzi fight for QB2.

[ChiefsCountry]

Originally Posted by Steron

I've said it another thread so I'll say it here.

I don't want Peyton Manning and the huge contract that will come with a 35 year old broken QB. He's only been sacked 231 times in 13 years (You can't really count 2011 as a 0, can you?). Do the math, that's 18 (I rounded up) times a season. We gave up 34 last year. Roughly double.

The same line that with Matt Cassel gave up nearly 3 sacks a game and with Kyle Orton only had 1 in 3 games. Our line is more on the QB than the actual OL itself.

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

The same line that with Matt Cassel gave up nearly 3 sacks a game and with Kyle Orton only had 1 in 3 games. Our line is more on the QB than the actual OL itself.

This.

[Mr_Tomahawk]

Originally Posted by Steron

Keep Orton for two years.
Cut or trade Cassel. I don't care which.
Draft Tannehill at 1.11.
Let Tannehill and Stanzi fight for QB2.

My signature agrees.

[RustShack]

Originally Posted by Steron

I've said it another thread so I'll say it here.

I don't want Peyton Manning and the huge contract that will come with a 35 year old broken QB. He's only been sacked 231 times in 13 years (You can't really count 2011 as a 0, can you?). Do the math, that's 18 (I rounded up) times a season. We gave up 34 last year. Roughly double. Of course he makes the offensive line better somewhat but do you want to have him getting hit for sacks at twice the rate he's used to? This doesn't even take into consideration plays where the QB gets hit but not sacked. (I admit I didn't look a long time for the QB hit stat). At 35 the body doesn't bounce back like it did at 25.


Keep Orton for two years.
Cut or trade Cassel. I don't care which.
Draft Tannehill at 1.11.
Let Tannehill and Stanzi fight for QB2.

If he makes a lot of money here that means he was more than worth the signing. Incentive based contracts mean you have to reach certain mile stones to earn that money. That's the kind of contract he said he will take to prove he can still play.

So, if he sucks like you claim he will, we don't lose a lot of money.

[Chiefnj2]

Originally Posted by RustShack

That's the kind of contract he said he will take to prove he can still play.

Do you really believe that?