Jaworski rates Chiefs QB at No. 20 among NFL starters

[RunKC]

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ

Nope, YOU CLAIM KC HAS MORE TALENT THAN DENVER. Good lord you're a friggen moron. All I did was say BS.

Wow, you are that stupid.

I said the Chiefs have equal or slightly more talent than you if you take away Manning, who was the difference.

Then your dumbass brought up a shitty Bill Williamson article which said you had ONE more top player, being Manning, so you proved MY point.

JFC you're a stupid Donkey troll.

You shouldn't call anyone's football IQ out when you're the one using a Bill ****ing Williamson article to prove a point.

[Coogs]

duncan_idaho,

To expand a little on my last post, I am in agreement with what Sac has said best in regards to what Smith is going to do for our defense this season. By keeping them fresh and not giving them a short field to defend, I expect our defense to be better. Much better in fact.

And if we actually start playing with a lead in the 2nd half, I expect this team to be able to pin their ears back and get after QB's... something we didn't have the luxury of being able to do last season.

Again, this is my opinion.

[duncan_idaho]

Originally Posted by Coogs

duncan_idaho,

To expand a little on my last post, I am in agreement with what Sac has said best in regards to what Smith is going to do for our defense this season. By keeping them fresh and not giving them a short field to defend, I expect our defense to be better. Much better in fact.

And if we actually start playing with a lead in the 2nd half, I expect this team to be able to pin their ears back and get after QB's... something we didn't have the luxury of being able to do last season.

Again, this is my opinion.

Sure. I agree with that. I think it's worth somewhere between 5-7 wins. Maybe 8 on the high side.

Enough to get into the playoffs. Not really enough to do anything once you get there, when you examine Smith's performances against strong, playoff-caliber defenses.

The defense still won't be as good as San Francisco's has been the past two seasons. I also think it's a little unreasonable to expect Smith to be as efficient while throwing more often and being asked to be more aggressive as he was in San Francisco.

[Tombstone RJ]

Originally Posted by RunKC

I said the Chiefs have equal or slightly more talent than you if you take away Manning, who was the difference.

Then your dumbass brought up a shitty Bill Williamson article which said you had ONE more top player, being Manning, so you proved MY point.

JFC you're a stupid Donkey troll.

You shouldn't call anyone's football IQ out when you're the one using a Bill ****ing Williamson article to prove a point.

You said kc has more talent, I said BS. You then said "where do you disagree?" I then pointed out TE as one example. Then you basically pulled your same old BS claiming that Moeaki is some kind of great TE.

I said the Broncos are deeper at TE and then I proved this by pointing out an article from Williamson who has one of the Broncos TEs listed but not Maoeki. Your only defense is to claim Williamson sucks. Which is typical of a tard like yourself when you've just been handed your ass in an argument.

Keep ****ing that chicken, loser.

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ

You said kc has more talent, I said BS. You then said "where do you disagree?" I then pointed out TE as one example. Then you basically pulled your same old BS claiming that Moeaki is some kind of great TE.

I said the Broncos are deeper at TE and then I proved this by pointing out an article from Williamson who has one of the Broncos TEs listed but not Maoeki. Your only defense is to claim Williamson sucks. Which is typical of a tard like yourself when you've just been handed your ass in an argument.

Keep ****ing that chicken, loser.

I don't think he ever tried to say moeaki was great, just that he had better stats than dressen with much worse qb's. And I don't think an article mentioning one of the broncos proves then a much deeper unit either.
You do realize what "deeper" means, right?
Posted via Mobile Device

[Tombstone RJ]

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

I don't think he ever tried to say moeaki was great, just that he had better stats than dressen with much worse qb's. And I don't think an article mentioning one of the broncos proves then a much deeper unit either.
You do realize what "deeper" means, right?
Posted via Mobile Device

Yes, it means better, as in the entire unit as a whole.

Here's his original post on the subject:

Originally Posted by RunKC

QB-Donks by far
RB-Chiefs by far
TE-Chiefs
WR-Donks by far, but Bowe is good tho
OL-Push...you damn well bet that Manning makes them look good with his quick decisions
DL-Donks..Chiefs weakest unit, but Donks don't really have anyone special there anyway
LB-Chiefs by far...Von is best, but we have 3 pro bowlers. Better as a group.
DB-Chiefs-Not by much, but Champ is descending and I'd take Berry and Flowers over DRC and Moore any day of the week and it's not close.

Sorry, but the Broncos are better at the TE position with Tamme and Dreesen, and the young guys like Green and Thomas.

Here's what he said when I pointed out that Dreesen is nice depth:

Originally Posted by RunKC

The same Joel Dressen that had less receiving yards than Moeaki, our 3rd TE? Even though he had 8 more catches than him too? He sounds pretty awesome to me.

You sure do know football!

So RunTard uses our second best TE to somehow prove how great TE Moeaki is? Who the **** cares if Moeaki is better than our second best TE?

Williamson's article does not point out Moeaki as being a anything special but it does say Tamme is one of the top 40 talents in the AFCW.

[RunKC]

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ

Yes, it means better, as in the entire unit as a whole.

Here's his original post on the subject:



Sorry, but the Broncos are better at the TE position with Tamme and Dreesen, and the young guys like Green and Thomas.

Here's what he said when I pointed out that Dreesen is nice depth:



So RunTard uses our second best TE to somehow prove how great TE Moeaki is? Who the **** cares if Moeaki is better than our second best TE?

Williamson's article does not point out Moeaki as being a anything special but it does say Tamme is one of the top 40 talents in the AFCW.

I don't see where I'm saying Moeaki is a great TE like you're saying. He's just as good as Dreessen.

[RunKC]

Originally Posted by Tombstone RJ

You said kc has more talent, I said BS. You then said "where do you disagree?" I then pointed out TE as one example. Then you basically pulled your same old BS claiming that Moeaki is some kind of great TE.

I said the Broncos are deeper at TE and then I proved this by pointing out an article from Williamson who has one of the Broncos TEs listed but not Maoeki. Your only defense is to claim Williamson sucks. Which is typical of a tard like yourself when you've just been handed your ass in an argument.

Keep ****ing that chicken, loser.

never said Moeaki was a great TE you stupid idiot. He's basically the same or better than the one you're pimping.

Broncos TE's are not better.

And no Dreessen does not have better hands than Moeaki. Moeaki's hands have always been good. He even made a one handed amazing catch.

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Originally Posted by RunKC

never said Moeaki was a great TE you stupid idiot. He's basically the same or better than the one you're pimping.

Broncos TE's are not better.

And no Dreessen does not have better hands than Moeaki. Moeaki's hands have always been good. He even made a one handed amazing catch.

His hands are good, but the rest of him needs augmentation and/or implants:

[Pasta Little Brioni]

Originally Posted by RunKC

never said Moeaki was a great TE you stupid idiot. He's basically the same or better than the one you're pimping.

Broncos TE's are not better.

And no Dreessen does not have better hands than Moeaki. Moeaki's hands have always been good. He even made a one handed amazing catch.

RJ and hef make knowmo look like a genius. They are not worth your time.