You guys really have weepy vaginas!!!!!!!

[splatbass]

Originally Posted by Sorter

I wish that the entire discussion would end.

No one is forcing you to read the thread.

[Sorter]

Originally Posted by splatbass

No one is forcing you to read the thread.

Thanks! This was incredibly insightful and really quite helpful!

[splatbass]

Originally Posted by Sorter

Thanks! This was incredibly insightful and really quite helpful!

Going into a thread, reading it through to the 19th page, then whining about how you wish the thread didn't exist is pretty stupid, don't you think?

[Sorter]

Originally Posted by splatbass

Going into a thread, reading it through to the 19th page, then whining about how you wish the thread didn't exist is pretty stupid, don't you think?

Who said I read the entire thread?


. You're truly a moron, aren't you?

[splatbass]

Originally Posted by Sorter

Who said I read the entire thread?


. You're truly a moron, aren't you?

I'm not the one still posting in a thread hours after saying that he wished the thread went away....

[Sorter]

Originally Posted by splatbass

I'm not the one still posting in a thread hours after saying that he wished the thread went away....

I wish the entire topic of discussion went away.

Also, why so many periods?

[splatbass]

Originally Posted by Sorter

I wish the entire topic of discussion went away.

Also, why so many periods?

Ellipsis Marks

Use ellipsis marks when omitting a word, phrase, line, paragraph, or more from a quoted passage.

There are many methods for using ellipses. The three-dot method is the simplest and is appropriate for most general works and many scholarly ones. The three- or four-dot method and an even more rigorous method used in legal works require fuller explanations that can be found in other reference books.


These are commonly used as a way of trailing off a sentence, kind of a fade out, or used in a sentence to connect two or more different thoughts, like a stream of consciousness type of thing.

[Mav]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

I think you missed where I said this wasn't a Smith/Smith debate for me.

This attitude towards young QBs is not a new phenomenon around here.

Really? This place was really pumped up over Tyler Bray after the Packers preseason game.

I don't think that is true at all. And no one can honestly tell me, although some will try, (clay, sdh) that there is a big enough difference in ceilings to say that having Bray, opposed to having Geno is a big deal.

Its not. The difference is that while Bray gets to take the Aaron Rodgers route, Geno Smith is having to go the Alex Smith, David Carr, Joey Harrington, Ryan Leaf route of being the guy far too soon, even though they weren't ready to do so.

If I am not mistaken, Geno Smith was passed by the jets not once, but TWICE in the first round?

Dee Milliner, and then Sheldon Richardson? So he was their 3rd option?

Yet, he is a starter, and people are freaking out over a bad game.

Where as Chiefs fans are upset because they don't take risks with qbs.

Isnt Bray a risk? Sure, hes going to sit for a minimum of a year, probably two, but if you can win now, and groom your qb, isn't that like the ultimate situation?

And, last point. If Alex Smith does indeed fail, and the Chiefs end up with a high pick in the top 10, they can draft a qb to compete with Bray.

Seems like a pretty sound strategy to me.

[OnTheWarpath15]

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace

Really? This place was really pumped up over Tyler Bray after the Packers preseason game.

Final point and I'm going to bow out.

The fanbase is excited about Bray because he carries no risk. He's a UDFA. He doesn't work out, nothing lost.

I guarantee people wouldn't have the same feelings for Bray had we taken him in the 1st or 2nd round. Because then he's "risky".

It's all about risk with the fanbase. People claim that the wrong QB sets the franchise back a decade. Meanwhile, taking the wrong 5-tech, WR, Safety or NT is no big deal.

People can argue all they want, but the numbers don't lie. Want to win a Super Bowl? Draft a QB in the first 32 picks - by far the best odds. Yes, pocket aces can get cracked, but I'll take them every hand over 8-3 offsuit and take my chances.

[SAUTO]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

Final point and I'm going to bow out.

The fanbase is excited about Bray because he carries no risk. He's a UDFA. He doesn't work out, nothing lost.

I guarantee people wouldn't have the same feelings for Bray had we taken him in the 1st or 2nd round. Because then he's "risky".

It's all about risk with the fanbase. People claim that the wrong QB sets the franchise back a decade. Meanwhile, taking the wrong 5-tech, WR, Safety or NT is no big deal.

People can argue all they want, but the numbers don't lie. Want to win a Super Bowl? Draft a QB in the first 32 picks - by far the best odds. Yes, pocket aces can get cracked, but I'll take them every hand over 8-3 offsuit and take my chances.

Exactly right.

And then they try to justify it because "he might have been projected one overall this year".


Lmao, and I'm a bray fan
Posted via Mobile Device

[Earthling]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

Final point and I'm going to bow out.

The fanbase is excited about Bray because he carries no risk. He's a UDFA. He doesn't work out, nothing lost.

I guarantee people wouldn't have the same feelings for Bray had we taken him in the 1st or 2nd round. Because then he's "risky".

It's all about risk with the fanbase. People claim that the wrong QB sets the franchise back a decade. Meanwhile, taking the wrong 5-tech, WR, Safety or NT is no big deal.

People can argue all they want, but the numbers don't lie. Want to win a Super Bowl? Draft a QB in the first 32 picks - by far the best odds. Yes, pocket aces can get cracked, but I'll take them every hand over 8-3 offsuit and take my chances.

I'm excited about Bray because of what I saw when he played in preseason; not because he carries no risk. What others may or may not like about Bray, and their reasons, I would not hazard a guess.

[Marcellus]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

People can argue all they want, but the numbers don't lie. Want to win a Super Bowl? Draft a QB in the first 32 picks - by far the best odds. Yes, pocket aces can get cracked, but I'll take them every hand over 8-3 offsuit and take my chances.

More 1st round QB's have won SB's because typically the more talented players, gasp, go in the 1st round than later rounds.

Geno went in the 2nd round, therefore he isn't as talented as a typical 1st round QB. By this tried and true logic Geno is less likely to win a SB.

We dodged a bullet.

[Rasputin]

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

Final point and I'm going to bow out.

The fanbase is excited about Bray because he carries no risk. He's a UDFA. He doesn't work out, nothing lost.

I guarantee people wouldn't have the same feelings for Bray had we taken him in the 1st or 2nd round. Because then he's "risky".

It's all about risk with the fanbase. People claim that the wrong QB sets the franchise back a decade. Meanwhile, taking the wrong 5-tech, WR, Safety or NT is no big deal.

People can argue all they want, but the numbers don't lie. Want to win a Super Bowl? Draft a QB in the first 32 picks - by far the best odds. Yes, pocket aces can get cracked, but I'll take them every hand over 8-3 offsuit and take my chances.

QFT

People don't want to take a chance on a QB first or second round so our reward is 0 wins in the playoffs 20 years. Thanks Carl for neutering this franchise fan base.