Chiefs Too early to talk about the Steelers? - Page 5

RunKC · 01-01-2017, 10:33 PM

Listen, the odds of Miami not getting anally raped by Ben Rapeslisburger is low. There's no way in hell those guys beat Pitt on the road with a backup QB, especially after seeing them shit the bed at home today.

It's pretty much set guys. We're playing the Steelers at home.

RunKC · 01-02-2017, 01:23 AM

Best believe Haley will do everything to try to embarrass us. He takes games against us personally.

We'll need to see a strong defensive performance up front in this one if we want to win. We'll need the Eric Berry from Mile High to show up and pop Bell if he makes it far.

**** it, I'd just play him In the box on all early downs.

NJChiefsFan · 01-02-2017, 01:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC

Best believe Haley will do everything to try to embarrass us. He takes games against us personally.

We'll need to see a strong defensive performance up front in this one if we want to win. We'll need the Eric Berry from Mile High to show up and pop Bell if he makes it far.

**** it, I'd just play him In the box on all early downs.

To answer your OP question, I do think this thread is too early. Let's enjoy our stress free weekend next week. If we get the hardest matchup on paper, then we can worry about the Bs.

**DaneMcCloud** · 01-02-2017, 01:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by NJChiefsFan

Bell will be the key. I do think the afc south is worse than the north. Not sure if the records say that but I think cin, bal, and pit are all the best team in the south. Maybe ten is equal to cin.

Record wise, the South is superior to the North.

It's pretty amazing that Gus Bradley went 2-12 and Doug Marrone went 1-1 at the very end of the season.

Proof positive that Bradley was an awful head coach.

TripleThreat · 01-02-2017, 01:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC

Listening to Terez Paylor's post game video from KCStar Facebook page and Mellinger dropped something interesting in there:

"I talked to a prominent Chiefs player about possibly playing Pittsburgh again and they said this team wants to play Pittsburgh again. We haven't forgotten."

I could see our team getting so ****ing hyped for this game.

And good thing we get 2 weeks to prepare since I think it's a safe bet to say pitts gonna win

NJChiefsFan · 01-02-2017, 01:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

Record wise, the South is superior to the North.

It's pretty amazing that Gus Bradley went 2-12 and Doug Marrone went 1-1 at the very end of the season.

Proof positive that Bradley was an awful head coach.

I really enjoyed the stat that bellichek would have to go 0-16 for 42 years to equal Bradley's winning percentage.

BlackOp · 01-02-2017, 02:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TripleThreat

I think it's a safe bet to say pitts gonna win

Yeah...like KC is some 7-9 team that backed into the play-offs. If you knew your head from your ass...you would understand that the game was an anomaly in the Sutton era. A perfect shit-storm.

If the Steelers were so dominant..how did they lose 34-3 the week before to the 7-9 Eagles? How come they didn't get wiped like that again...how come KC didn't get wiped like that again?

eDave · 01-02-2017, 02:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TripleThreat

I could see our team getting so ****ing hyped for this game.

And good thing we get 2 weeks to prepare since I think it's a safe bet to say pitts gonna win

Complete bullshit. Go to bed.

Coochie liquor · 01-02-2017, 05:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eDave

Complete bullshit. Go to bed.

I think (but not positive) that he was talking about Pitt beating Miami not KC.

JD10367 · 01-02-2017, 06:20 AM

It will be a tough game for KC and will require both Alex and Andy to not shit their pants, but as long as KC doesn't lose the turnover battle I don't see Pitt beating them. Rapistberger alone, with his offensive weapons, will keep it a nailbiter, but the Steelers' D is not what it used to be and Tyreek is unique (hey, alliteration). The Steelers' O will outplay KC's but KC will probably have a special teams return TD (or at least a very long run to put them in very short field position for a TD) along with a defensive turnover for a TD (or, again, a very long INT/fumble return to put them in position for a short TD). So the Steelers might win the yardage battle, 415 to 325, but they're going to lose the turnover battle and the special teams returns. Chiefs 27, Steelers 23 in a game that will come down to a "knock it down!" play in the end zone to seal the deal.

(And you can pretty much copy and paste this scenario for the AFCCG but, since the Patriots' bend-but-don't-break D is a little better than Pitt's, the final score there will be reversed... Patriots 27, Chiefs 23.)

chefs fan in omaha · 01-02-2017, 06:25 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Direckshun

How?

SUH

oldman · 01-02-2017, 06:31 AM

Yes, it is too early to worry about this game.

**dannybcaitlyn** · 01-02-2017, 06:47 AM

I worry if Steelers commit to the run they beat us. Bell will be the best back we face and our run defense isn't very good. We get no penetration and hardly make a tackle behind the line of scrimmage. Our defensive linemen get stood up at the point t of attack and the running back (especially Bell) has time to make a sandwich while patiently waiting for a hole to open. I hope Sutton comes up with a good game plan.

TigeRRUppeRRcut · 01-02-2017, 06:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

The Steelers won the weakest division in football and it wasn't even impressive.

The Chiefs defense will have its far share of problems with Bell but the crowd will help.

The thing that helps me sleep at night is the red zone run defense hasn't been terrible this season

Red Dawg · 01-02-2017, 06:49 AM

It would be a miracle to avoid Pitt but it's not happening. Chiefs will be trying to climb Mount Everest to get to the SB. We always have a chance playing at home. The game is a 50/50 shot. Beating NE on the road is a long shot at best. It couldn't be any more difficult. Rough match ups is an understatement.

R Clark · 01-02-2017, 07:52 AM

Chris jones ihas a little more experience this time around.that should help ,need the mlb to step way up also

01-01-2017, 10:33 PM
RunKC Andy Reid Supporter Join Date: Apr 2012 Casino cash: $-1440389	Too early to talk about the Steelers? Listen, the odds of Miami not getting anally raped by Ben Rapeslisburger is low. There's no way in hell those guys beat Pitt on the road with a backup QB, especially after seeing them shit the bed at home today. It's pretty much set guys. We're playing the Steelers at home.
Posts: 52,077

01-02-2017, 01:23 AM	#61
RunKC Andy Reid Supporter Join Date: Apr 2012 Casino cash: $-1440389	Best believe Haley will do everything to try to embarrass us. He takes games against us personally. We'll need to see a strong defensive performance up front in this one if we want to win. We'll need the Eric Berry from Mile High to show up and pop Bell if he makes it far. ** it, I'd just play him In the box on all early downs. __________________ Mike Greenberg@Espngreeny I can’t fathom what it must be like to be a fan of the #Chiefs. Adopt a Chief: Jared Wiley**
Posts: 52,077

01-02-2017, 06:20 AM	#69
JD10367 Cheaterlover* Join Date: May 2009 Location: RI Casino cash: $10010716	It will be a tough game for KC and will require both Alex and Andy to not shit their pants, but as long as KC doesn't lose the turnover battle I don't see Pitt beating them. Rapistberger alone, with his offensive weapons, will keep it a nailbiter, but the Steelers' D is not what it used to be and Tyreek is unique (hey, alliteration). The Steelers' O will outplay KC's but KC will probably have a special teams return TD (or at least a very long run to put them in very short field position for a TD) along with a defensive turnover for a TD (or, again, a very long INT/fumble return to put them in position for a short TD). So the Steelers might win the yardage battle, 415 to 325, but they're going to lose the turnover battle and the special teams returns. Chiefs 27, Steelers 23 in a game that will come down to a "knock it down!" play in the end zone to seal the deal. (And you can pretty much copy and paste this scenario for the AFCCG but, since the Patriots' bend-but-don't-break D is a little better than Pitt's, the final score there will be reversed... Patriots 27, Chiefs 23.)
Posts: 12,916

01-02-2017, 06:31 AM	#71
oldman Curmudgeon Join Date: Dec 2011 Location: North by Northwest Casino cash: $5836784	Yes, it is too early to worry about this game.
Posts: 5,319

01-02-2017, 06:47 AM	#72
dannybcaitlyn Supporter Join Date: Oct 2004 Casino cash: $3214000	I worry if Steelers commit to the run they beat us. Bell will be the best back we face and our run defense isn't very good. We get no penetration and hardly make a tackle behind the line of scrimmage. Our defensive linemen get stood up at the point t of attack and the running back (especially Bell) has time to make a sandwich while patiently waiting for a hole to open. I hope Sutton comes up with a good game plan.
Posts: 7,713

01-02-2017, 06:49 AM	#74
Red Dawg Going home eventually Join Date: Dec 2002 Casino cash: $1432858	It would be a miracle to avoid Pitt but it's not happening. Chiefs will be trying to climb Mount Everest to get to the SB. We always have a chance playing at home. The game is a 50/50 shot. Beating NE on the road is a long shot at best. It couldn't be any more difficult. Rough match ups is an understatement. __________________ If you're not first you're last!
Posts: 33,097

01-02-2017, 07:52 AM	#75
R Clark Veteran Join Date: Aug 2001 Casino cash: $2774900	Chris jones ihas a little more experience this time around.that should help ,need the mlb to step way up also
Posts: 2,795

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode