Top five reactions to the game.

[KC_Connection]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

So, changing your story once again?

Where did the story change? I called him a bad decision maker, not a bad coach. That's what he is, his history in Philadelphia supports that.

You're a liar and a fool. You've dug your own hole.

Have fun in 4 hours using your two degrees from the "University of Kansas".



Tool.

Got it all out of your system yet, Dane?

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by KC_Connection

Where did the story change? I called him a bad decision maker, not a bad coach. That's what he is, his history in Philadelphia supports that.

His history of unprecedented success in Philly shows that he's a "bad decision maker"?

How many chromosomes are you missing, Mr. "Two Degrees from KU"? And what time are required to be at work mopping the floors tomorrow with those two degrees?

[KC_Connection]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

His history of unprecedented success in Philly shows that he's a "bad decision maker"?

No, Andy's poor decision making in big games does. Ask any Eagles fan (or really, anyone familiar with his work) about that.

And what exactly is unprecedented about a team making the playoffs a bunch of times and losing when they get there?

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by KC_Connection

No, Andy's poor decision making in big games does. Ask any Eagles fan (or really, anyone familiar with his work) about that.

So, you have no actual proof that Andy Reid makes "bad decisions" during "big games".

That's exactly what I figured. You're talking put of your ass.

Originally Posted by KC_Connection

And what exactly is unprecedented about a team making the playoffs a bunch of times and losing when they get there?

More proof that you're talking out of your ass AND you're unfamiliar with Eagles history.

[KC_Connection]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

So, you have no actual proof that Andy Reid makes "bad decisions" during "big games".

The proof is in those games. It's why he has a lot of critics like this who knock his tactics (http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com...-lot-of-games/), why Lurie called him out upon his firing for " scattered decision making" and why Eagles fans will always remember moments like this:

It's a strange thing to be galled about, when you step back and consider it, but it was galling. The number of times they actually did win topped out in 2004-05, at 15: 13 regular-season victories, two playoff victories, and the ball in Donovan McNabb's hands with 5:40 to go in the Super Bowl, within striking distance of a beatable Patriots team. The Eagles needed two scores, and they got one of them—on that still-baffling three-minute-45-second slow march down the field, their relentless downfield progress matched by the even-more-relentless draining of the clock. It was the Andy Reid-iest sequence of Andy Reid's career; I watched it with a friend who hates the Eagles, and he abandoned his rooting interest and started yelling at the TV set in sheer objective disbelief and frustration. How could any team be so stupid with so much on the line?

http://deadspin.com/5972253/andy-rei...how-bad-he-was

More proof that you're talking out of your ass AND you're unfamiliar with Eagles history.

I wasn't aware you were referring to solely Eagles history. That's a completely different standard. Because NFL history is full of talented teams that failed repeatedly in the playoffs.