"The way it looks now back-up Geoff Schwartz ... will likely sign elsewhere."

[RealSNR]

Originally Posted by -King-

And what makes you think that Schwartz won't revert back playing like the backup that he's been his whole career? He's honestly not much better than a rookie. Otherwise, he wouldn't have only 2 seasons with more than 3 games started in his career.



Why is that? Since when are guards a hard position to find late in the draft?

Guards aren't difficult to find late in the draft, but that doesn't mean every guard you draft is gold.

Hell, just look at the ones the Chiefs have taken in the 2nd and 3rd rounds. Even if there's great potential in them, none of them have ever been ready to start Week 1.

It's far more likely that our late round guard or Rishaw Johnson isn't ready and sucks. Far more than it is that Geoff Schwartz, a multi-year veteran who has played well for two different teams, can't handle a starting spot that he already took over last year adequately.

Schwartz isn't ideal. I agree. He's also not Will Shields. I know that, too. But all he costs is money. And not that much. We're not giving him Andy Levitre or Carl Nicks money.

In my opinion, that's the option that provides the most security and the best player for the cheapest price.

[-King-]

Originally Posted by SNR

Guards aren't difficult to find late in the draft, but that doesn't mean every guard you draft is gold.

Hell, just look at the ones the Chiefs have taken in the 2nd and 3rd rounds. Even if there's great potential in them, none of them have ever been ready to start Week 1.

It's far more likely that our late round guard or Rishaw Johnson isn't ready and sucks. Far more than it is that Geoff Schwartz, a multi-year veteran who has played well for two different teams, can't handle a starting spot that he already took over last year adequately.

Not really.

He allowed 6 sacks in 2010 when he was a starter http://www.profootballweekly.com/pla...hwartz-267010/

Other than that he's been a career backup. You think that's a coincidence?

[ct]

Originally Posted by -King-

Not really.

He allowed 6 sacks in 2010 when he was a starter http://www.profootballweekly.com/pla...hwartz-267010/

Other than that he's been a career backup. You think that's a coincidence?

Seriously dude, don't link a site that literally has an out of business sign posted on the front page from 9 freakin months ago...

fail, seriously fail

[-King-]

Originally Posted by ct

Seriously dude, don't link a site that literally has an out of business sign posted on the front page from 9 freakin months ago...

fail, seriously fail

All their stats are provided by Stats.inc.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by -King-

Not really.

He allowed 6 sacks in 2010 when he was a starter http://www.profootballweekly.com/pla...hwartz-267010/

Other than that he's been a career backup. You think that's a coincidence?

The problem with these stats is that they are not broken down by position.
He started about 5 or 6 games at RT and gave up most of those 6 sacks ther (3 that I watched).

He was far more steady at guard.