|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Who is better that Alex Smith? | |||
| Aaron Rodgers - Green Bay Packers |
   
|
193 | 91.90% |
| Andrew Luck - Indianapolis Colts |
  
|
178 | 84.76% |
| Andy Dalton - Cincinnati Bengals |
  
|
49 | 23.33% |
| Ben Roethlisberger - Pittsburgh Steelers |
  
|
138 | 65.71% |
| Brian Hoyer - Cleveland Browns |
  
|
5 | 2.38% |
| Cam Newton - Carolina Panthers |
  
|
108 | 51.43% |
| Carson Palmer - Arizona Cardinals |
|
23 | 10.95% |
| Chad Henne - Jacksonville Jaguars |
|
8 | 3.81% |
| Colin Kaepernick - San Francisco 49ers |
|
86 | 40.95% |
| Derek Carr - Oakland Raiders |
|
15 | 7.14% |
| Drew Brees - New Orleans Saints |
|
187 | 89.05% |
| EJ Manuel - Buffalo Bills |
|
13 | 6.19% |
| Eli Manning - New York Giants |
|
87 | 41.43% |
| Geno Smith - New York Jets |
|
25 | 11.90% |
| Jay Cutler - Chicago Bears |
|
71 | 33.81% |
| Joe Flacco - Baltimore Ravens |
|
89 | 42.38% |
| Matt Cassel - Minnesota Vikings |
|
9 | 4.29% |
| Matt Ryan - Atlanta Falcons |
|
115 | 54.76% |
| Matthew Stafford - Detroit Lions |
|
104 | 49.52% |
| Mike Glennon - Tampa Bay Buccaneers |
|
10 | 4.76% |
| Nick Foles - Philadelphia Eagles |
|
78 | 37.14% |
| Peyton Manning - Denver Broncos |
|
185 | 88.10% |
| Philip Rivers - San Diego Chargers |
|
156 | 74.29% |
| Robert Griffin III - Washington Redskins |
|
59 | 28.10% |
| Russell Wilson - Seattle Seahawks |
|
147 | 70.00% |
| Ryan Fitzpatrick - Houston Texans |
|
7 | 3.33% |
| Jake Locker - Tennessee Titans |
|
11 | 5.24% |
| Ryan Tannehill - Miami Dolphins |
|
22 | 10.48% |
| Shaun Hill - St. Louis Rams |
|
7 | 3.33% |
| Tom Brady - New England Patriots |
|
190 | 90.48% |
| Tony Romo - Dallas Cowboys |
|
95 | 45.24% |
| All of them |
|
11 | 5.24% |
| None of them |
|
9 | 4.29% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 210. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
09-02-2014, 08:22 PM
|
#10 | |||
|
Niner Trash
Join Date: Mar 2013
Casino cash: $10013638
|
Quote:
I've made the case that 24 points is the area where, if you score more you are likely to win games, if you score less you are likely to lose games. You can't isolate lopsided losses and then analyze that as a trend. OK, as a trend, when your Defense gives up 34 or more YOU ALMOST ALWAYS LOSE. PERIOD. There is another fact for you. The thing is, a forum member was spouting records based on when opponents score more than 24 points. You and some others called that meaningless. It is NOT meaningless, and I've showed you why it is not meaningless. So if you win 6-3, that is an outlier, but it doesn't void the overall trend that in MOST games, if you score more than 24 or hold opponents to under 24, you GENERALLY win. I don't care if you gave up 34 or 94 points in your losses. The trend is the trend. It is why the metric of 24 points you call "meaningless" is valuable, not meaningless.
__________________
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
Posts: 2,911
  |
|
|
|
Who is better than Alex Smith?
Threaded Mode