Talking Draft Prospects

OldSchool · 10-13-2014, 10:14 PM

So far from what I've seen, the draft stacks up like this:

1. 3-4 OLB prospects- Very strong (makes sense that Dorsey would take one in a relatively weak year and probably pass on one in a strong year, just like he did with ignoring the WR position)

2. OL - Strong

3. WR - above average

4. CBs - above average

5. 5-Techs/DTs- above average (mostly thanks to Williams)

6. QB - Average (Mariota is the only high 1st round lock)

7. S - average (I can see several rookie starters coming from this group. It's about the same level of talent as last year)

8. ILB - average (no one really stands out as the best of the bunch, several solid starters but no stars in the making)

9. TE - below average (weakest position whether or not you count Funchess as part of the group, be glad Dorsey took Kelce when he did)

Your thoughts?

10-13-2014, 10:14 PM	#11
OldSchool MVP Join Date: Sep 2013 Casino cash: $10035212	So far from what I've seen, the draft stacks up like this: 1. 3-4 OLB prospects- Very strong (makes sense that Dorsey would take one in a relatively weak year and probably pass on one in a strong year, just like he did with ignoring the WR position) 2. OL - Strong 3. WR - above average 4. CBs - above average 5. 5-Techs/DTs- above average (mostly thanks to Williams) 6. QB - Average (Mariota is the only high 1st round lock) 7. S - average (I can see several rookie starters coming from this group. It's about the same level of talent as last year) 8. ILB - average (no one really stands out as the best of the bunch, several solid starters but no stars in the making) 9. TE - below average (weakest position whether or not you count Funchess as part of the group, be glad Dorsey took Kelce when he did) Your thoughts?
Posts: 12,727