Chiefs So if the Chiefs are the #6 seed...who would you rather face? - Page 6

Hammock Parties · 11-23-2015, 10:10 PM

New England will almost assuredly be the #1 seed.

That leaves Denver and Cincy fighting for the #2 and #3 seed.

3 seed plays the 6 seed in the first round...so the Chiefs will visit Denver or Cincy.

Who you want?

TEX · 11-24-2015, 08:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bewbies

Denver. Without question.

Beat them twice in Denver in the same year, **** them.

This.

We also should petition the NFL to let us wear Crisco, get to push their TE out of bounds in end zone as he's coming down with the football to negate a TD (legal today but not back in the '90's) and call a phantom hold against Denver on a FG...

rico · 11-24-2015, 08:21 AM

Broncos...for sure. I am not impressed with that Brock Osweiler, at all. He has a slow, weird release and his mobility is by no means, Big Ben. Broncos will be pursuing a new QB in the semi-near future.

The Chiefs have proven that they can handle the Donk's other facets.

ILChief · 11-24-2015, 08:25 AM

Well historically Cincinnati is on a worse playoff drought than us. They did however wipe the field with us earlier. We are playing much better now though. I need to see more from Asswiler and see if five head comes back to judge Denver. How about try to get the 5 seed and hope Houston wins the south?

Mile High Mania · 11-24-2015, 08:28 AM

I think a 3rd game with out teams would be fun, both lost at home giving up 5 turnovers - weird.

So much football left at this point, no room for error with the final 2 seeds.

**BigMeatballDave** · 11-24-2015, 08:30 AM

Shit, Denver will be fortunate to get the 4 seed.

**Donger** · 11-24-2015, 08:31 AM

I'm a little fuzzy with the nomenclature: if the Chiefs actually make the playoffs this year, will they have "backed in"?

ILChief · 11-24-2015, 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger

I'm a little fuzzy with the nomenclature: if the Chiefs actually make the playoffs this year, will they have "backed in"?

No, quite the opposite

Mile High Mania · 11-24-2015, 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigMeatballDave

Shit, Denver will be fortunate to get the 4 seed.

How so? They're 3 games up on KC and on the AFCS division leader with 6 games left... it's a near lock that they maintain the #3 seed and possibly could snag the #2, but we'll wait on that one.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger

I'm a little fuzzy with the nomenclature: if the Chiefs actually make the playoffs this year, will they have "backed in"?

Starting out 1-5, there wouldn't be a 'backing in' not if they continue to roll up wins... Colts, now they're trying to back into a division title.

**Donger** · 11-24-2015, 08:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILChief

No, quite the opposite

Neat. So backed in implies that it only happens if other teams lose?

Mile High Mania · 11-24-2015, 08:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger

Neat. So backed in implies that it only happens if other teams lose?

At this point, if KC (5-5) goes 3-3 (or worse) down the stretch and all the other teams fail to do better and then KC still advances at 8-8, then you could say they backed in... because they did nothing to gain an advantage while no other teams took over.

This is what's happening in the AFCS...

KC has gone from 1-5 to 5-5, so go over .500 in the final 6 and there's no backing into the playoffs.

**Donger** · 11-24-2015, 08:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania

At this point, if KC (5-5) goes 3-3 (or worse) down the stretch and all the other teams fail to do better and then KC still advances at 8-8, then you could say they backed in... because they did nothing to gain an advantage while no other teams took over.

This is what's happening in the AFCS...

KC has gone from 1-5 to 5-5, so go over .500 in the final 6 and there's no backing into the playoffs.

Thanks MHM. It's interesting here in Denver, that's for sure.

Mile High Mania · 11-24-2015, 08:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger

Thanks MHM. It's interesting here in Denver, that's for sure.

Yeah, can only imagine ... has to be a split that thinks there's no way we do anything without Manning, but I think that's a minority of the fan base quite honestly.

Maybe Denver catches the Patriots on a good week with the injuries, how dam crazy will the locals be if Denver (with Brock at QB) can topple the Patriots? You know, this is the kind of crazy shit that happens in the NFL. That place will be insane if that were to happen. Brady is 5-5 vs Denver, and I believe most of those losses are in Denver.

**BigMeatballDave** · 11-24-2015, 08:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mile High Mania

How so? They're 3 games up on KC and on the AFCS division leader with 6 games left... it's a near lock that they maintain the #3 seed and possibly could snag the #2, but we'll wait on that one.

It's really very simple.

I posted this in a different thread, but if the Chiefs win out and finish 11-5, then Denver loses to NE, Cincy, and Pitt, which could easily happen. Denver finishes 11-5.

Chiefs win division on better division record.

Mile High Mania · 11-24-2015, 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigMeatballDave

It's really very simple.

I posted this in a different thread, but if the Chiefs win out and finish 11-5, then Denver loses to NE, Cincy, and Pitt, which could easily happen. Denver finishes 11-5.

Chiefs win division on better division record.

Hey, good luck with all that ... winning 10 in a row to end the regular season would be awesome heading into the wildcard weekend. What a letdown a playoff loss would be at that point. I know that 4 in a row is great, but that's putting a lot of pressure on the team to go 10-0.

Mother****erJones · 11-24-2015, 10:39 AM

I want ****ing Indy bad. I want revenge and kick their ****ing asses with a healthy team.

View Poll Results: So if the Chiefs are the #6 seed...who would you rather face?
Bengals	7	6.93%
Broncos	94	93.07%
Voters: 101. You may not vote on this poll

11-23-2015, 10:10 PM
Hammock Parties I'll be back. Join Date: Nov 2002 Casino cash: $910478	So if the Chiefs are the #6 seed...who would you rather face? New England will almost assuredly be the #1 seed. That leaves Denver and Cincy fighting for the #2 and #3 seed. 3 seed plays the 6 seed in the first round...so the Chiefs will visit Denver or Cincy. Who you want?
Posts: 297,073

11-24-2015, 08:25 AM	#78
ILChief MVP Join Date: Jan 2001 Casino cash: $7774831	Well historically Cincinnati is on a worse playoff drought than us. They did however wipe the field with us earlier. We are playing much better now though. I need to see more from Asswiler and see if five head comes back to judge Denver. How about try to get the 5 seed and hope Houston wins the south?
Posts: 11,477

11-24-2015, 08:28 AM	#79
Mile High Mania #triggering Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Tejas Casino cash: $1007229	I think a 3rd game with out teams would be fun, both lost at home giving up 5 turnovers - weird. So much football left at this point, no room for error with the final 2 seeds. __________________
Posts: 30,896

11-24-2015, 08:30 AM	#80
BigMeatballDave GBM 8-12-15 Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Dayton, Oh. Casino cash: $10052154	Shit, Denver will be fortunate to get the 4 seed. __________________ 2015 Adopt-a-Chief: Tamba Hali
Posts: 59,997

11-24-2015, 08:31 AM	#81
Donger "Think BOOM!" Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: 33.675° N 106.475° W Casino cash: $6829900 VARSITY	I'm a little fuzzy with the nomenclature: if the Chiefs actually make the playoffs this year, will they have "backed in"? __________________ I think the young people enjoy it when I "get down," verbally, don't you?
Posts: 191,134