The Super Bowl was rigged...

[B2chiefsfan]

That is all...

[Nzoner]

Originally Posted by Sully

I'm not understanding what is so remarkable about the "united" theme of the Pats after 9/11. The entire country was working under similar themes in all walks of life.

The Rams in their gold/yellow and blue uniforms were on the same stage and they didn't do it.

He asked for an explanation,I gave one based on my connection of my dots and it won me some cash,end of story.

[Toby Waller]

Originally Posted by listopencil

You can clearly see the tip of the ball hit the ground before he secured it. The ball was moving around in his grip before and after the impact.

you are missing the point. I dont care if that was actually a catch or not.
I've seen it happen 100 times the last two years that the call is usually the opposite of what everyone else obviously see's and they interpret the rule as they choose to get the outcome they want.

you are also showing you have been indoctrinated to believe a catch is what ever they told you. Slo mo shows he had two hands on the ball clutched to his chest. He did in fact catch the ball whether it hit the ground when he went down or not. He did in fact catch the ball.

if the ground cant cause a fumble,how can it cause an incomplete pass after the ball has already been caught?

even if I'm wrong about this one catch, I'm still right about my universal observation of how they go about ruling on these so called catches/non-catches



and remember- I'm siding with the Panther receiver here even though I knew they were losing. Thats called building -action drama-...and it was needed for one of those "commercial breaks"

[Jive Ass]

It seems like so many of the calls on catches like that are ambiguous as hell. I've never heard anything other than vaguely referenced reasoning to back up the decisions.

[Toby Waller]

Originally Posted by splatbass

They are the most marketed players because they are GOOD, troll.

so you are saying that the league is lucky that the players that last the longest and have better careers are also the better looking more literate ones who happen to get major corporate endorsements.
spots in movies,tv shows, saturday night live.....

of course youll say Manning is ugly but I of course already said that his fathers legacy was rewarded by the league.

oh yeah,thats another thing. Their dad is on the Saints and never wins but somehow,his son's,in two completely separate situations and in seperate leagues as QBs make it to 6 super bowls combined and go 4-2 combined !



pay attention to football on your phone. It predicted Manning going to SB 50 and the restaurant has a silver panther in it.

[Toby Waller]

Originally Posted by Jive Ass

It seems like so many of the calls on catches like that are ambiguous as hell. I've never heard anything other than vaguely referenced reasoning to back up the decisions.

correct,you hear the announcers making up excuses for reasons all night stumbling over their words

[Dinny Bossa Nova]

Has anybody ever played a Black Sabbath album backwards? Or how about Hank Jr.'s "Are You Ready For Some Football" backwards?

Sergeant Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band album played in reverse is where the world first learned of Paul McCartney's death. It's bound to come true sooner or later. The key is not giving up.

Dinny

[listopencil]

Originally Posted by smellypitts

You are also showing you have been indoctrinated to believe a catch is what ever they told you.

No, you are so deep into your conspiracy theory bullshit that you don't understand that a catch is actually defined by the rules that they play by. If your opinion is contrary to the rules then it's worthless.

[Toby Waller]

Originally Posted by listopencil

No, you are so deep into your conspiracy theory bullshit that you don't understand that a catch is actually defined by the rules that they play by. If your opinion is contrary to the rules then it's worthless.

yep,you are indoctrinated. You just said a catch is what they told you it was and I explained how they designed the rules so they are never wrong

[Sully]

Originally Posted by Nzoner

The Rams in their gold/yellow and blue uniforms were on the same stage and they didn't do it.

He asked for an explanation,I gave one based on my connection of my dots and it won me some cash,end of story.

Well, yeah. Different teams do different things.

[rabblerouser]

Originally Posted by Dinny Blues

Has anybody ever played a Black Sabbath album backwards? Or how about Hank Jr.'s "Are You Ready For Some Football" backwards?

Sergeant Peppers Lonely Hearts Club Band album played in reverse is where the world first learned of Paul McCartney's death. It's bound to come true sooner or later. The key is not giving up.

Dinny

No, Sgt Pepper has a dog whistle in the run out groove.

The Paul is Dead mularky comes from the fade out of Strawberry Fields; John says "Cranberry Sauce", and some folks heard "I buried Paul"

[listopencil]

Originally Posted by smellypitts

yep,you are indoctrinated. You just said a catch is what they told you it was and I explained how the designed the rules so they are never wrong

I'm going to go by the rule that the Denver Broncos always get one more point than whatever team they are playing against. I know that the NFL won't go along with this but that's just because they want to control who wins. If you disagree with me then you're just being indoctrinated to believe that the NFL gets to tell you what scoring means. WAKE UP SHEEPLE!

[ClevelandBronco]

Originally Posted by smellypitts

you are missing the point. I dont care if that was actually a catch or not.
I've seen it happen 100 times the last two years that the call is usually the opposite of what everyone else obviously see's and they interpret the rule as they choose to get the outcome they want.

you are also showing you have been indoctrinated to believe a catch is what ever they told you. Slo mo shows he had two hands on the ball clutched to his chest. He did in fact catch the ball whether it hit the ground when he went down or not. He did in fact catch the ball.

if the ground cant cause a fumble,how can it cause an incomplete pass after the ball has already been caught?

even if I'm wrong about this one catch, I'm still right about my universal observation of how they go about ruling on these so called catches/non-catches



and remember- I'm siding with the Panther receiver here even though I knew they were losing. Thats called building -action drama-...and it was needed for one of those "commercial breaks"

Leaving aside the question of what a catch is these days, the ground can cause a fumble despite the conventional wisdom that it can't.

1. No one touches the guy with the ball, he falls and loses control of the ball due to the way his body or the ball hits the ground. That's a fumble.

2. The runner is contacted and as he is tackled, but before his knees, elbows, forearms, wrists, back, ass or whatever hits the ground, he reaches out with the ball to try to keep his balance. The ball hits the ground before anything else and the impact between the ball and the ground causes him to lose his grip on it. He then falls to the turf as the tackle is completed. That's a fumble.

Don't say shit like "The ground can't cause a fumble" just because you've heard it a thousand times from the twits in the press box.

[Sully]

Originally Posted by smellypitts

so you are saying that the league is lucky that the players that last the longest and have better careers are also the better looking more literate ones who happen to get major corporate endorsements.
spots in movies,tv shows, saturday night live.....

Like Marshawn Lynch, Jamal Charles, Lawrence Taylor, Randy Moss, Mike Vick, Ben Roethlesberger, Emmitt Smith.........!!!

[Toby Waller]

Originally Posted by splatbass

They are the most marketed players because they are GOOD, troll.

it doesnt matter how good they are if they cant act.

think about that for a while.

defensive player of the year 3 of the last 4 years
..and he just happens to have decent comedic timing.
but you want to believe he only got the commercials because he's a good player?
why does the defensive player of the year also happen to be the best actor/clown ?

what a glorious accident the nfl ran into without having any knowledge they would get so lucky!

[splatbass]

Originally Posted by Sully

Well, yeah. Different teams do different things.

Proves a conspiracy. If they both did the same thing it would also prove a conspiracy. Everything proves a conspiracy if you want it to bad enough.