|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Two-piece poll | |||
| Part 1. Which of these teams has the STRONGEST QB history over the past 50 years? |
   
|
1 | 3.85% |
| Tennessee |
  
|
9 | 34.62% |
| Carolina |
  
|
4 | 15.38% |
| Arizona |
  
|
1 | 3.85% |
| New Orleans |
  
|
9 | 34.62% |
| Jacksonville |
  
|
1 | 3.85% |
| Part 2. Which of these teams has the WEAKEST QB history over the past 50 years? |
|
0 | 0% |
| Tennessee |
|
3 | 11.54% |
| Carolina |
|
3 | 11.54% |
| Arizona |
|
1 | 3.85% |
| New Orleans |
|
1 | 3.85% |
| Jacksonville |
|
17 | 65.38% |
| I don't vote south of the Mason-Dixon line. |
|
1 | 3.85% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 26. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
07-12-2016, 06:27 PM
|
#1 |
|
Unsparing
Join Date: Aug 2008
Casino cash: $10004900
|
Mmm....
|
|
Posts: 77,135
  |
|
|
07-13-2016, 06:28 AM
|
#2 | |
|
NFL's #1 Ermines Fan
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: My house
Casino cash: $2898491
 VARSITY
|
Quote:
I went with Arizona. Jim Hart was good for a long time, and Lomax, Plummer, Warner, and Palmer have all had their moments. It's not an epic QB group, but overall they've had 30+ years of general competence. I could see an argument for Tennessee at the top too, just because of Moon's dominance and some good years from McNair. I think New Orleans is a step down because Brees is really the only strong QB they've had. I think Archie Manning was overrated. Jacksonville is okay in the long run, and I would rate them slightly above Carolina. Newton is very good, but Brunell was pretty good for a long time.
__________________
I'm putting random letters here as a celebration of free speech: xigrakgrah misorojeq rkemeseit. |
|
|
Posts: 141,807
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterbackery: Round 4, Heat 4
Hybrid Mode
