|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Two-point safety poll | |||
| Part 1. Which of these teams has the STRONGEST QB history over the past 50 years? |
   
|
1 | 3.45% |
| Tampa Bay |
  
|
1 | 3.45% |
| Washington |
  
|
16 | 55.17% |
| Kansas City |
  
|
12 | 41.38% |
| Cleveland |
  
|
1 | 3.45% |
| Chicago |
  
|
1 | 3.45% |
| Part 2. Which of these teams has the WEAKEST QB history over the past 50 years? |
|
2 | 6.90% |
| Tampa Bay |
|
8 | 27.59% |
| Washington |
|
0 | 0% |
| Kansas City |
|
6 | 20.69% |
| Cleveland |
|
8 | 27.59% |
| Chicago |
|
7 | 24.14% |
| QB or not QB, that is the question |
|
1 | 3.45% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 29. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
07-15-2016, 06:34 PM
|
#1 |
|
Seize life. Be an ermine.
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: My house
Casino cash: $-532449
 VARSITY
|
Okay, who wants to argue that Washington is better than Kansas City? It's an insane comparison.
8 years of Len Dawson versus 8 years of Joe Theisman - KC wins huge. Dawson is a Hall of Famer who really deserved it. 5 years of Trent Green versus 5 years of Sonny Jurgenson. Probably a draw. 7 years of Bill Kenney versus 7 years of Billy Kilmer. Probably a draw, but maybe a slight advantage to Washington. What else does Washington offer? Rypien, Kirk Cousins, a good year of RGIII, and a few wind-down years by guys way past their prime. What else does Kansas City offer? Two years of Montana. Check and mate. Add in three years of Alex Smith, 4 years of Deberg, and another good year here and there. I think the Chiefs win the battle on the low end of the roster, and Dawson blows away Washington's best. This is no contest.
__________________
Active fan of the greatest team in NFL history. |
|
Posts: 145,332
  |
|
|
|
|
|
Quarterbackery: Round 4, Heat 6
Hybrid Mode
