Chiefs Is it time to start Foles over Smith? - Page 89

Deberg_1990 · 09-11-2016, 12:32 PM

Pathetic.

He's played poorly today

Thoughts?

ARROW2 · 11-01-2016, 02:42 PM

I am not even talking about stats, just make a play when it is there in front of your ****ing face instead of being a bitch.

**OnTheWarpath15** · 11-01-2016, 02:43 PM

Option 1: Hit a wide open Hill standing 17 yards directly in front of him.

Option 2: Throw the ball away.

Option 3. Run, slide ridiculously late, get egg scrambled.

And this guy is supposedly one of the smartest QB's in the league?

ARROW2 · 11-01-2016, 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

Option 1: Hit a wide open Hill standing 17 yards directly in front of him.

Option 2: Throw the ball away.

Option 3. Run, slide ridiculously late, get egg scrambled.

And this guy is supposedly one of the smartest QB's in the league?

. This is why we don't get respect.

oaklandhater · 11-01-2016, 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ARROW2

I am not even talking about stats, just make a play when it is there in front of your ****ing face instead of being a bitch.

Being a bitch is in his nature all he does is play passive Bullcrap the entire season I can't stand it anymore.

ARROW2 · 11-01-2016, 02:46 PM

People respect our defense and probably our weapons but not our QB. You can say all of the nice things you want about Smiff but he leaves a lot of points on the field EVERY SINGLE WEEK. I'm fed up. Foles comes in without a leash and lights it up. Colts had no answer for anything we wanted to do after that. That is what you are SUPPOSED to do to the colts.

Discuss Thrower · 11-01-2016, 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

Option 1: Hit a wide open Hill standing 17 yards directly in front of him.

Option 2: Throw the ball away.

Option 3. Run, slide ridiculously late, get egg scrambled.

And this guy is supposedly one of the smartest QB's in the league?

And options 2 and 3 (sans injury aspect) are 100% defensible because to choose option 1 is just "fantasy team jerk off material".

Because **** having a QB capable of capitalizing on big plays, let's just rely on a running game and turnovers to keep the score close.

ARROW2 · 11-01-2016, 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower

And options 2 and 3 (sans injury aspect) are 100% defensible because to choose option 1 is just "fantasy team jerk off material".

Because **** having a QB capable of capitalizing on big plays, let's just rely on a running game and turnovers to keep the score close.

Hence no rings in 46 years

Sandy Vagina · 11-01-2016, 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ARROW2

People respect our defense and probably our weapons but not our QB. You can say all of the nice things you want about Smiff but he leaves a lot of points on the field EVERY SINGLE WEEK. I'm fed up. Foles comes in without a leash and lights it up. Colts had no answer for anything we wanted to do after that. That is what you are SUPPOSED to do to the colts.

ahaaaaaaaa!!!!

Discuss Thrower · 11-01-2016, 03:15 PM

I just love how it's a "Durrrr fantasy football ruining the game" narrative around here.

No. It matters *very* little if your starting QB puts up 210 1/0 TDs to INTs or 3/2 ratio and 305 if you ultimately win. What *does* matter when those yards are earned and points put on the board. Nobody rational would be bitching Smith got 55 of those yards and the TD on the final offensive possession of the game to either take the lead or to salt away a game.

Problem is that outside of maybe five total games in a decade long career Smith has proven incapable of doing just that. Prior to the head injury Smith was looking like he had the potential to actually come up big when the moment calls for it, which is what most rational fans who have been Smith skeptics are really asking for. Issue being they've been against awful defenses.

Foles very well might be totally incapable of putting points on the board when it matters and inept against an average or better defense. But he doesn't have the track record to exactly prove that point. Smith, on the other hand, has a track record of being foiled in critical situations or against average to good defenses.

Q'ing myself here but we know Smith's ceiling and his floor. We don't know Foles' ceiling but have a pretty good idea that Foles' floor is much lower than Smith's.

Sandy Vagina · 11-01-2016, 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Discuss Thrower

Q'ing myself here but we know Smith's ceiling and his floor. We don't know Foles' ceiling but have a pretty good idea that Foles' floor is much lower than Smith's.

Well keep on a shoutin' it, bruh. Another 100x a day, and maybe Andy will get the message. You have that power! Carry on!

ARROW2 · 11-01-2016, 03:22 PM

Yes, it is time to start Foles over Smiff. He doesn't even run any more.

Sandy Vagina · 11-01-2016, 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ARROW2

Yes, it is time to start Foles over Smiff. He doesn't even run any more.

so how do you feel about Smith starting over Foles?

we are all dying to know...

oaklandhater · 11-01-2016, 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks

so how do you feel about Smith starting over Foles?

we are all dying to know...

It will be the best day ever when we have a offensive meltdown sandy and you and the other Alex ballwasher will still be tossing your same old bull crap excuses with foles on the roster

Sandy Vagina · 11-01-2016, 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oaklandhater

It will be the best day ever when we have a offensive meltdown sandy and you and the other Alex ballwasher will still be tossing your same old bull crap excuses with foles on the roster

There really is no way that this ends poorly for me.

I like Foles, as well as Smith. If Foles really is better, then bring it on.

I respect Smith enough that I'd want him to retire before he gets killed. Dude has too many gigabytes to risk, and will do so much more in life after football.

If Foles comes in and fails horribly, I can at least laugh at some of you.

If Foles comes in and is great, you can laugh at me, but I'll be smiling over winning.. so go on ahead.

If Foles doesn't come in at all, then I will go back to watching Smith win... and then likely wave g'bye to Foles, as they decline to pick up his expensive QB2 option for next yr.

I'm good.

ARROW2 · 11-01-2016, 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks

so how do you feel about Smith starting over Foles?

we are all dying to know...

You don't know? Have you not read my posts?

09-11-2016, 12:32 PM
Deberg_1990 In Search of a Life Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: San Antonio Tx. Casino cash: $334454	Is it time to start Foles over Smith? Pathetic. He's played poorly today Thoughts?
Posts: 68,417

11-01-2016, 02:42 PM	#1321
ARROW2 MVP Join Date: Mar 2002 Casino cash: $9174329	I am not even talking about stats, just make a play when it is there in front of your ****ing face instead of being a bitch.
Posts: 6,036

11-01-2016, 02:43 PM	#1322
OnTheWarpath15 MVP Join Date: Sep 2005 Casino cash: $2231115	Option 1: Hit a wide open Hill standing 17 yards directly in front of him. Option 2: Throw the ball away. Option 3. Run, slide ridiculously late, get egg scrambled. And this guy is supposedly one of the smartest QB's in the league?
Posts: 60,746

11-01-2016, 02:46 PM	#1325
ARROW2 MVP Join Date: Mar 2002 Casino cash: $9174329	People respect our defense and probably our weapons but not our QB. You can say all of the nice things you want about Smiff but he leaves a lot of points on the field EVERY SINGLE WEEK. I'm fed up. Foles comes in without a leash and lights it up. Colts had no answer for anything we wanted to do after that. That is what you are SUPPOSED to do to the colts.
Posts: 6,036

11-01-2016, 03:15 PM	#1329
Discuss Thrower "You like to drink?" Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: "I like to drink." Casino cash: $-160000	I just love how it's a "Durrrr fantasy football ruining the game" narrative around here. No. It matters very little if your starting QB puts up 210 1/0 TDs to INTs or 3/2 ratio and 305 if you ultimately win. What does matter when those yards are earned and points put on the board. Nobody rational would be bitching Smith got 55 of those yards and the TD on the final offensive possession of the game to either take the lead or to salt away a game. Problem is that outside of maybe five total games in a decade long career Smith has proven incapable of doing just that. Prior to the head injury Smith was looking like he had the potential to actually come up big when the moment calls for it, which is what most rational fans who have been Smith skeptics are really asking for. Issue being they've been against awful defenses. Foles very well might be totally incapable of putting points on the board when it matters and inept against an average or better defense. But he doesn't have the track record to exactly prove that point. Smith, on the other hand, has a track record of being foiled in critical situations or against average to good defenses. Q'ing myself here but we know Smith's ceiling and his floor. We don't know Foles' ceiling but have a pretty good idea that Foles' floor is much lower than Smith's. __________________ Chiefs 2016 Opponents: Home: JAX, TEN, NO, TB, NYJ. Away: HOU, IND, ATL, CAR, PIT Chiefs 2017 Opponents: Home: BUF, MIA, PHI, WSH, AFC North. Away: NE, NYJ, NYG, DAL, AFC South
Posts: 45,207

11-01-2016, 03:22 PM	#1331
ARROW2 MVP Join Date: Mar 2002 Casino cash: $9174329	Yes, it is time to start Foles over Smiff. He doesn't even run any more.
Posts: 6,036