04-27-2017, 07:29 PM
|
#11
|
Supporter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Olathe, Ks
Casino cash: $-1015873
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ's left nut
{Shrug}
I guess that's that.
The Chiefs cannot give up what it will take to move into the top 10 and the cost/benefit doesn't work out as well anymore either since the 5th year option on a quarterback taken in the top 10 QB would be the rough equivalent of a franchise tag for him.
So you're getting 4 years under cost, 1 of which is on the bench. And for that privilege you're probably giving up your 1st and second this year and next.
Mahomes has been my top target since this process started but I just cannot see giving up the bullets needed to make that happen.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by chiefforlife
Damn, I really want this kid. Top 10 is to much though...
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by staylor26
Yea this report is probably BS
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Detoxing
Pffff....really guys?
This is just a smoke screen or conjecture. Rumors all over the place right now.
Also, Q.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by staylor26
It's crazy how quick people are to believe a report from a Bills beat writer when it disputes everything we've heard so far.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by BryanBusby
Buffalo would of just traded Tyrod to Cleveland if they felt they were gonna take a QB.
Sounds like bullshit.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Laz
Nobody knows this
Teams would probably want our 1st next year to trade up that high.
|
Laz wins....
|
Posts: 132,440
|
|