Update on Tyreek Hill

[nychief]

Originally Posted by MAHOMO 4 LIFE!

Brooke’s title in her article says kid removed from Hills care. When if you actually read the article it says he was temporarily removed and placed with a relative because of ongoing matters. Temporarily not permanent. I swear Brooke hates Hill with a passion

It's a headline, dumb dumb.... and it's accurate. I swear you hate women with a passion.

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by nychief

It's a headline, dumb dumb.... and it's accurate. I swear you hate women with a passion.

Actually an accurate title would be "Tyreek Hill's child placed with a relative during investigation"

The headline they used makes it look like he's in the foster system.

[Codered]

Originally Posted by Mecca

Actually an accurate title would be "Tyreek Hill's child placed with a relative during investigation"

The headline they used makes it look like he's in the foster system.

Why do you care what the title of the article says more than the fact that the court ordered the child out of his parent's house? I swear the priorities around here.

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by Codered

Why do you care what the title of the article says more than the fact that the court ordered the child out of his parent's house? I swear the priorities around here.

Because the way they've covered this whole thing is shoddy at best. Lots of people just read headlines the last thing anyone needs is if this turns out to be nothing is half the city thinking he's guilty cause of some headline they read.

[Codered]

Originally Posted by Mecca

Because the way they've covered this whole thing is shoddy at best. Lots of people just read headlines the last thing anyone needs is if this turns out to be nothing is half the city thinking he's guilty cause of some headline they read.

No, I would say you are upset the picture that fits your ideal outcome hasn't been met and that upsets you. At this point, very little real information has been released by any media outlet. It's been a wait and see mode. However, we do now know that temporary custody has been lost.

But, by all means, let's focus on how terrible an article headline is.

[FAX]

Originally Posted by Codered

No, I would say you are upset the picture that fits your ideal outcome hasn't been met and that upsets you. At this point, very little real information has been released by any media outlet. It's been a wait and see mode. However, we do now know that temporary custody has been lost.

But, by all means, let's focus on how terrible an article headline is.

Anyone who thinks this situation hasn't been sensationalized by the KC press (to the extent they can) is either stupid, willfully obtuse, or a Star reporter. There is an important difference between implication and fact.

Some people will lap up the pap. All day, every day.

FAX

[Codered]

Originally Posted by FAX

Anyone who thinks this situation hasn't been sensationalized by the KC press (to the extent they can) is either stupid, willfully obtuse, or a Star reporter. There is an important difference between implication and fact.

Some people will lap up the pap. All day, every day.

FAX

Or some people don't really care what is reported and wait for outcomes. I don't read the Star so maybe that is why it never mattered to me. I don't know, but the lack of discussion about the fact that he lost custody and the focus on an article headline is a bit silly.

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by nychief

It's a headline, dumb dumb.... and it's accurate. I swear you hate women with a passion.

With the sensitivity to the issue, you'd think she'd be more careful with that. It's a really bad and very leading headline. I've chose to keep mostly quiet on this thing until we know what happened. But that right there was either intentionally misleading or not very well thought out.

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

With the sensitivity to the issue, you'd think she'd be more careful with that. It's a really bad and very leading headline. I've chose to keep mostly quiet on this thing until we know what happened. But that right there was either intentionally misleading or not very well thought out.

This from the paper that had all their sports writers basically leading with 1 line of "we don't know if he's guilty or not" then writing thousands of words about what a piece of shit he is after it...then apologizing about shit they said a week later so no one would notice..

It's all about clicks, the star has really covered this poorly and have tried to sensationalize it at every turn.

[FAX]

Originally Posted by nychief

It's a headline, dumb dumb.... and it's accurate. I swear you hate women with a passion.

She's a maenadic gorgon, Mr. nychief. A succubus want-a-be. And old-school hellhound and harridan.

One can appreciate women while simultaneously hating those. That's perfectly normal.

Bottom line ... she would love to see Tyreek off the team and out of the league because it suits her politics. Call her on it and she'll claim victimhood and freedom of the press.

FAX

[TravelingChiefs]

Originally Posted by nychief

It's a headline, dumb dumb.... and it's accurate. I swear you hate women with a passion.

Pryor hates KC and is looking for a GOTCHA so she can move on to some liberal rag. When she tweets about sports it's mostly about North Carolina, she doesn't know sports and just retweets breaking news. She's worthless as a sports reporter let alone the actual Chiefs beat reporter. There's a lot of women sports reporters that do a great job. Brooke is not among that group.