How many games will Tyreek Hill be suspended?

[TLO]

Time for your daily Tyreek Hill thread, ChiefsPlanet!

Poll to follow.

[BossChief]

My fear is that photos will be sold to TMZ of Tyreeks son with welts and bruises similar to those of Adrian Peterson’s son and that Godell puts him on the exempt list for a year.

[Munson]

I went with 2, but could be a maximum of 4.

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by BossChief

My fear is that photos will be sold to TMZ of Tyreeks son with welts and bruises similar to those of Adrian Peterson’s son and that Godell puts him on the exempt list for a year.

Not a chance.

The Espinal gang has no access to that kid anymore.

I doubt they thought to take such wretched photographs.

And in any case, we have a public admission of guilt by Crystal.

[BleedingRed]

https://twitter.com/sign_and_trade/s...992316928?s=21

[GloryDayz]

Should be 0.

[RetiredSeniorChief]

Voted 0, but he should lose at least one game check for picking a Dingbat for a mate.

[YontsRBake]

2 for the audio recording.

[Pitt Gorilla]

Originally Posted by YontsRBake

2 for the audio recording.

I still don’t understand this line of thinking. The audio recording is meaningless.

[Chief Roundup]

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla

I still don’t understand this line of thinking. The audio recording is meaningless.

It is not a "line of thinking". It is the rules and the way it is and has been used on players before.

https://static.nfl.com/static/conten...0000828506.pdf

Personal Conduct PolicyLeague Policies for Players | 2016 Expectations and Standards of Conduct

It is not enough simply to avoid being found guilty of a crime. We are all held to a higher standard and must conduct ourselves in a way that is responsible, promotes the values of the NFL, and is lawful. Players convicted of a crime or subject to a disposition of a criminal proceeding(as defined in this Policy)are subject to discipline. But even if the conduct does not result in a criminal conviction, players found to have engaged in any of the following conduct will be subject to discipline.
Prohibited conduct includes but is not limited to the following:
Actual or threatened physical violence against another person, including dating violence, domestic violence, child abuse, and other forms of family violence;
Stalking, harassment, or similar forms of intimidation;
Conduct that poses a genuine danger to the safety and well-being of another person;
Conduct that undermines or puts at risk the integrity of the NFL, NFL clubs, or NFL personnel.

Hope this helps. This is not the complete list of rules but it is the ones that I thought could or might be used against Hill in this situation.

[Pitt Gorilla]

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup

It is not a "line of thinking". It is the rules and the way it is and has been used on players before.

https://static.nfl.com/static/conten...0000828506.pdf

Personal Conduct PolicyLeague Policies for Players | 2016 Expectations and Standards of Conduct

It is not enough simply to avoid being found guilty of a crime. We are all held to a higher standard and must conduct ourselves in a way that is responsible, promotes the values of the NFL, and is lawful. Players convicted of a crime or subject to a disposition of a criminal proceeding(as defined in this Policy)are subject to discipline. But even if the conduct does not result in a criminal conviction, players found to have engaged in any of the following conduct will be subject to discipline.
Prohibited conduct includes but is not limited to the following:
Actual or threatened physical violence against another person, including dating violence, domestic violence, child abuse, and other forms of family violence;
Stalking, harassment, or similar forms of intimidation;
Conduct that poses a genuine danger to the safety and well-being of another person;
Conduct that undermines or puts at risk the integrity of the NFL, NFL clubs, or NFL personnel.

Hope this helps. This is not the complete list of rules but it is the ones that I thought could or might be used against Hill in this situation.

Which of those has he done?

[Chief Roundup]

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla

Which of those has he done?

OMG really. I think you are just trolling or need to go do some research about what all has transpired.

[YontsRBake]

Originally Posted by Pitt Gorilla

I still don’t understand this line of thinking. The audio recording is meaningless.

I don’t disagree in terms of the legal system and overall meaning, but in 2019 the NFL has a strong PC standard to live up to in terms of PR. I hope it’s 0, I just feel like the media will get on Goodells ass and he’ll cave on 2 games.

[Buehler445]

160. Because Chiefs

[Pitt Gorilla]

Originally Posted by Chief Roundup

OMG really. I think you are just trolling or need to go do some research about what all has transpired.

Perhaps I'm mis-remembering, but I don't recall evidence for any of those.

[BoxWine_Stouffers_TubeSock]

I'm okay with a 2 game suspension. We don't need Hill to beat the Jagoffs and Faiders. Hell, we could probably start our cheerleaders and still win.

Any more than that is completely unacceptable. We have a 9 game stretch of potentially strong opponents.