Mike Florio on 610

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Originally Posted by Raiderhader

And that is odd. The story of a young black man being framed with The Man (media in this case) complicit in it is the kind of story he creams himself over.

I didn't get it at first either but now I see it plain as day. What he has done, is to jump in with the "greater good" crowd. He will sacrifice as many black athletes has he has to in order to advance the progressive agenda because he believes that only through the progressive agenda can all black people get the equality that they deserve.

So if Tyreek has to die in order to get the United States people of color their reparations and the laundry list of "we deserve(s) simply because we are black" , then so be it says Whitlock.

He has completely and 100% bought in. Which to me, makes him the enemy. Your mileage may vary.

[TEX]

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate

I didn't get it at first either but now I see it plain as day. What he has done, is to jump in with the "greater good" crowd. He will sacrifice as many black athletes has he has to in order to advance the progressive agenda because he believes that only through the progressive agenda can all black people get the equality that they deserve.

So if Tyreek has to die in order to get the United States people of color their reparations and the laundry list of "we deserve(s) simply because we are black" , then so be it says Whitlock.

He has completely and 100% bought in. Which to me, makes him the enemy. Your mileage may vary.

Interesting...

[mdstu]

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate

I didn't get it at first either but now I see it plain as day. What he has done, is to jump in with the "greater good" crowd. He will sacrifice as many black athletes has he has to in order to advance the progressive agenda because he believes that only through the progressive agenda can all black people get the equality that they deserve.

So if Tyreek has to die in order to get the United States people of color their reparations and the laundry list of "we deserve(s) simply because we are black" , then so be it says Whitlock.

He has completely and 100% bought in. Which to me, makes him the enemy. Your mileage may vary.

I think your original reaction to jwit is more accurate. He will do and say whatever it takes to get the attention he requires.

All of the race baiting takes he's had over the years were just said/written to garner attention. Hell, they weren't even consistent. He will take what ever side that will get the most reaction.

Also, he didn't "support" SOC because he's a Chiefs fan, he supported it because he had an ax to grind with Pioli. HE IS NOT A CHIEFS FAN.

Every time he shows his face on this forum, it should be every posters duty to simply reply with "**** YOU".

[007]

Originally Posted by mdstu

I think your original reaction to jwit is more accurate. He will do and say whatever it takes to get the attention he requires.



All of the race baiting takes he's had over the years were just said/written to garner attention. Hell, they weren't even consistent. He will take what ever side that will get the most reaction.



Also, he didn't "support" SOC because he's a Chiefs fan, he supported it because he had an ax to grind with Pioli. HE IS NOT A CHIEFS FAN.



Every time he shows his face on this forum, it should be every posters duty to simply reply with "**** YOU".

Talking heads on Monday are going to be entertaining.

[ARROW2]

Originally Posted by 007

Talking heads on Monday are going to be entertaining.

**** EM!!!

[Sweet Daddy Hate]

Originally Posted by mdstu

I think your original reaction to jwit is more accurate. He will do and say whatever it takes to get the attention he requires.

All of the race baiting takes he's had over the years were just said/written to garner attention. Hell, they weren't even consistent. He will take what ever side that will get the most reaction.

Also, he didn't "support" SOC because he's a Chiefs fan, he supported it because he had an ax to grind with Pioli. HE IS NOT A CHIEFS FAN.

Every time he shows his face on this forum, it should be every posters duty to simply reply with "**** YOU".

it may be more accurate to say that it's a combination of both of these things. The only thing that gives me pause on that is remembering the time when he had been given a big break and was supposed to have his own show or did have his own show for a while. It was during that time that someone revealed the minutes of one of the staff meetings for this show and let me tell you, it was all about agenda, agenda, agenda.

And I don't mean the agenda of good sports journalism.