|
|
View Poll Results: Who wins this Sunday? | |||
Chiefs |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
66 | 52.80% |
Bengals |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
55 | 44.00% |
Whatever Gaz thinks |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
4 | 3.20% |
Voters: 125. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() ![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#16 |
Why so serious?
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Chicago
Casino cash: $-1329585
|
|
Posts: 13,285
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
Old, not Dead
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: Where the Buffalo Roam...
Casino cash: $9160400
|
You really want to know?
__________________
A nip here. A tuck there. Pretty soon you're talking about real money. ![]() |
Posts: 817
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
Has a particular set of skills
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: On the water
Casino cash: $-671038
![]() |
__________________
Mahomes is not a game manager. Release the Kraken. |
Posts: 81,290
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
Has a particular set of skills
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: On the water
Casino cash: $-671038
![]() |
50/50 so far
__________________
Mahomes is not a game manager. Release the Kraken. |
Posts: 81,290
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
Best Body On ChiefsPlanet
Join Date: Jan 2014
Casino cash: $-415100
|
Coin flip
|
Posts: 6,275
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 |
Beyond the Rapids
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Langley, VA
Casino cash: $-370000
|
OBJ REVENGE GAME
Nah. JK. IDK. Obv. |
Posts: 80,659
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
MVP
Join Date: Mar 2021
Casino cash: $-729600
|
Being booed at Arrowhead will either motivate or destroy. Thanks to the fickle
Last edited by Rainbarrel; 12-27-2023 at 07:54 AM.. |
Posts: 10,431
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
MVP
Join Date: Aug 2019
Casino cash: $-979600
|
The Chiefs used to have a DT named John Browning. The Bengals current QB is named Jake Browning. If we were playing Madden for Sega, they would both be J. Browning, and both would likely be ranked in the low 70s. Coincidence? Most definitely. How does this matter? It really doesn’t.
Thank you for reading and enjoy your day! |
Posts: 9,768
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
Feeling Victorian
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Nebraska/Wyoming/Colorado
Casino cash: $-113564
|
Depends on whether or not the Chiefs want to win a ball game. It's as simple as that. It's been pretty evident since the bye they haven't been very motivated to do so.
__________________
It bears repeating, **** Herm, Pioli, Haley, and Crennel for ****ing up my franchise for a goddamn decade. Buehler 445 |
Posts: 33,983
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
Politically Incorrect
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Casino cash: $-820000
|
If we find a way to **** this game up, heads gotta roll.
__________________
"The only difference between sex for free and sex for money is that sex for free costs you a WHOLE LOT more!" ~Redd Foxx~ ![]() "The men who drafted Patrick Mahomes" ![]() |
Posts: 54,975
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
Prestige Worldwide
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Spring Hill, KS
Casino cash: $-69474
|
Bengals.
I have seen nothing from this team in recent weeks to suggest otherwise.
__________________
Adopt-A-Chief: John Dorsey
|
Posts: 18,619
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
GDT white noise poster
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Chonson County
Casino cash: $1868230
|
Chiefs will win. Defense is top tier and while the offense is struggling, they will manage to not have multiple turnovers (Mahomes throws a pick because of WRs doing something dumb).
Then they lose to the chargers because why not. |
Posts: 6,877
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
GDT white noise poster
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Chonson County
Casino cash: $1868230
|
yeah like I can live with the Broncos loss, it was bad but they were eventually going to win one. The Raiders loss yeah, it sucked but it's an afc west team who always plays us tough. You can't lose to the Bengals. It just can't happen, especially with Burrow out. If we come out looking like the Bears the Nagy experiment has to end.
|
Posts: 6,877
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
MVP
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Michigan
Casino cash: $-1170000
|
I flipped a coin and it came up Chiefs. That's the best I can offer.
The good news is their pass defense is extremely suspect. The bad news is our pass offense is extremely suspect. The good news is their rush defense is among the worst in the league. The bad news is we'll have Clyde and a newbie to run against it. The good news is their offense will be sporting a backup QB, likely without Chase at WR, and they have a turnstile at LT who's weaknesses we know intimately. The good news is also that our defense has been playing lights out. I guess I'll predict a banger, 17-9 Chiefs. |
Posts: 14,057
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
Starter
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Smithville MO
Casino cash: $4206429
|
IF the Chiefs defense hold the Bengals offence to 3 points like they did the Raiders, AND the Chiefs offence doesn't have multiple turnovers that result in points for the other team, AND we don't have a bunch of stupid penalties, then I say we have a pretty good chance.
Sincerely, Nostradamus PS. if we get rid of those stupid screenplays where we pitch out to the sideline at the LOS, we might actually not have so many 3rd and 10 plays to have to convert. |
Posts: 629
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|