FFL trade?

DenverChief · 09-09-2004, 11:24 PM

His offer:
E James
E Moulds
K Barlow
Da Clark

For my:
Tomlinson
Holt
Heap

I'm leaning towards no...should I change my mind?

HolmeZz · 09-09-2004, 11:25 PM

He was sure quick to try and get rid of James after he coughed up the ball twice in the red zone.

No way you should do that trade.

FloridaChief · 09-09-2004, 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverChief

...should I change my mind?

No. Keep what you got, DC...

DenverChief · 09-09-2004, 11:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HolmeZz

He was sure quick to try and get rid of James after he coughed up the ball twice in the red zone.

No way you should do that trade.

I was thinkin gthe same thing...course I have EJ in another league and he score me 13 pts tonight

**The Bad Guy** · 09-09-2004, 11:29 PM

I'd keep Tomlinson and Holt.

Bottom line is you're going to bump two guys off your lineup to acquire Barlow and Clark. Clark is a top 15 TE talent, and Barlow is a top 11-12 RB.

But Tomlinson and Holt are IMO the 2nd best players in the league at their positions.

**morphius** · 09-09-2004, 11:29 PM

Just say no. Top 2 RB, Top 2 TE and a Top 5 WR, for a couple of didn't do jack last year, a maybe and a dime a dozen?

Miles · 09-09-2004, 11:30 PM

At first glance it looks bad for you. Who are you other starting RB's other than Tomlinson?

DenverChief · 09-09-2004, 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Miles Teg

At first glance it looks bad for you. Who are you other starting RB's other than Tomlinson?

T.Henry and Garner

I was thinking the samething as most of you guys...I think marty is a running fool so LT will get gobs of yds and TDs

Miles · 09-09-2004, 11:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverChief

T.Henry and Garner

I was thinking the samething as most of you guys...I think marty is a running fool so LT will get gobs of yds and TDs

Definitly stick with what you have then.

Mile High Mania · 09-10-2004, 06:12 AM

Way too early for 7 player trades b/t two teams... and there's really no way I would give up Tomlinson and Holt. These two guys will be the crux of your points more often than not.

There's a reason he's trying to give you 4 players for 3... no need for trades like this after 1 regular season game.

Hoover · 09-10-2004, 07:06 AM

What about TO for Fred Taylor

Mojo Rising · 09-10-2004, 07:12 AM

DC - Dont do it. Like someone else said LT and TH are the 2nd best at their respective positions and will be your teams main focus. I had 2 keepers this year and they were both of them.

I would consider TO for FT only if you had 2 decent backs that could start. Taylor is due to get hurt this year.

Hoover · 09-10-2004, 07:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mojo Rising

DC - Dont do it. Like someone else said LT and TH are the 2nd best at their respective positions and will be your teams main focus. I had 2 keepers this year and they were both of them.

I would consider TO for FT only if you had 2 decent backs that could start. Taylor is due to get hurt this year.

I'm weak at RB.

My Backs are
Henry
Staley
Q Griffin
W Dunn

My WRs are Randy Moss, Owens and Marty Booker

09-09-2004, 11:24 PM
DenverChief MVP Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Rocky Ford Casino cash: $5699867	FFL trade? His offer: E James E Moulds K Barlow Da Clark For my: Tomlinson Holt Heap I'm leaning towards no...should I change my mind?
Posts: 16,177

09-09-2004, 11:25 PM	#2
HolmeZz i guess its bittersweet poetry Join Date: Nov 2003 Location: NeW HaVeN, CT Casino cash: $10004900	He was sure quick to try and get rid of James after he coughed up the ball twice in the red zone. No way you should do that trade.
Posts: 16,520

09-09-2004, 11:29 PM	#5
The Bad Guy Scott Pioli Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: The Copacobana Casino cash: $9373645	I'd keep Tomlinson and Holt. Bottom line is you're going to bump two guys off your lineup to acquire Barlow and Clark. Clark is a top 15 TE talent, and Barlow is a top 11-12 RB. But Tomlinson and Holt are IMO the 2nd best players in the league at their positions. __________________
Posts: 23,212

09-09-2004, 11:29 PM	#6
morphius World's finest morphius Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $6835027	Just say no. Top 2 RB, Top 2 TE and a Top 5 WR, for a couple of didn't do jack last year, a maybe and a dime a dozen?
Posts: 25,977

09-09-2004, 11:30 PM	#7
Miles MVP Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Dallas, TX Casino cash: $1402400	At first glance it looks bad for you. Who are you other starting RB's other than Tomlinson?
Posts: 14,522

09-10-2004, 06:12 AM	#10
Mile High Mania #triggering Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Tejas Casino cash: $3457229	Way too early for 7 player trades b/t two teams... and there's really no way I would give up Tomlinson and Holt. These two guys will be the crux of your points more often than not. There's a reason he's trying to give you 4 players for 3... no need for trades like this after 1 regular season game. __________________
Posts: 30,343

09-10-2004, 07:06 AM	#11
Hoover Rufus Dawes Jr. Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $1408179	What about TO for Fred Taylor
Posts: 17,385

09-10-2004, 07:12 AM	#12
Mojo Rising Veteran Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: OC Casino cash: $10009560	DC - Dont do it. Like someone else said LT and TH are the 2nd best at their respective positions and will be your teams main focus. I had 2 keepers this year and they were both of them. I would consider TO for FT only if you had 2 decent backs that could start. Taylor is due to get hurt this year.
Posts: 1,792