|
|
View Poll Results: Does natural child birth activate a baby? | |||
Of course. You should meet ________, it's proof. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 21.74% |
No way. Besides, if it did the chemicals would eventually wear out anyway. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
12 | 52.17% |
I'm not sure but I'd guess Gaz wan't activated. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 26.09% |
Voters: 23. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
Topic Starter |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2003
Casino cash: $10004900
|
I have a theory about C-section kids...
Ok, most of the people I've known in life who were born C-section have some stability issues. So here's my theory, let me know what you think:
Squeezing the baby's head during natural birth "activates" them, kind of like squeezing a chemical ice pack. When kids are born C-section they are denied activation and therefore have problems throughout life. Any medical personell that can help support or reject this theory? [edit] Ok, some of you were taking this WAAAAY to seriously (you know who you are). It was a joke. Have we really reached the point where when something this absurd is posted we actually believe it? I mean, come on, who am I, badgranny or chiefs8me? [/edit] Last edited by Simplex3; 04-13-2005 at 09:38 AM.. |
Posts: 28,527
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
|
|