Most Worrisome Injury?

Gaz · 09-13-2005, 09:36 AM

I read lots of differing opinions concerning which injury is most worrisome. So let us just poll it up, shall we?

xoxo~
Gaz
Tossing it up for grabs.

shakesthecat · 09-13-2005, 09:41 AM

I picked Roaf since I think Surtain plays this week.

When Roaf went down, the O went south.
Black played a little better in the 4th quarter, but Green was running for his life on just about every passing play.

RedThat · 09-13-2005, 09:42 AM

Tough one man. It either has to be Roaf or Surtain. Depends on who we play. This week, I think we can get by without Roaf, especially since the Raiders dont have any real pass rush threats, but, without Surtain? And having to cover Porter, Moss, Curry without Surtain, and instead we cover them with McCleon, Washington, and Sapp? fuhhhgeddaboudit!!

*Yeah, we need Surtain this week, most definately. We need him more than Roaf.

**ChiTown** · 09-13-2005, 09:43 AM

Sims

I think Roaf is an awfully close second, but we have better depth on the OL than we do at DT.

ct · 09-13-2005, 09:55 AM

For me, it is definitely Surtain. But Roaf is a close 2nd.

Redcoats58 · 09-13-2005, 09:56 AM

I would imagine the face of the woman that Larry Johnson backhanded.

**Rain Man** · 09-13-2005, 10:04 AM

My understanding is the Surtain will be back quickly, and that Richardson's problem wasn't serious.

That leaves us with Sims and Roaf. Both are worrisome, but losing Roaf for an extended period would be much more damaging at this point. The guy is a national treasure, and hamstring injuries can hang around forever, it seems.

Frazod · 09-13-2005, 10:19 AM

Roaf being out long term definitely concerns me more than anything else. Surtain being out hurts, but pressure from the improved LB corps will negate that somewhat.

All of the offense's success begins and ends with the line. Improved D or no, this is the key to the team's success.

As I said last night, thank God we won't be seeing a real defense for the next couple of weeks.

Jmart · 09-13-2005, 10:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man

The guy is a national treasure

Brilliant!

htismaqe · 09-13-2005, 11:07 AM

Sounds like all of them except for Sims will be ready for the Raiders...which means Sims remains at the top...

htismaqe · 09-13-2005, 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by shakesthecat

I picked Roaf since I think Surtain plays this week.

When Roaf went down, the O went south.
Black played a little better in the 4th quarter, but Green was running for his life on just about every passing play.

Black played the entire game.

The O went south when Willie left for 2 reasons:

1) Black was already subbing for Sampson, and had to be moved to LT, putting CHRIS BOBER in the game.

2) Saunders said they went into a shell to protect the lead.

With Sampson back this week, we'll be ok.

trndobrd · 09-13-2005, 11:13 AM

The consensus opinion was that Trent Green was the most important player for a successful Chiefs season. The loss of Sims, Surtain and Richardson might affect the outcome of a game or two. The loss of Roaf not only limits the running game, but it opens up the possibility of Trent Green getting pounded and possibly injured by a quality pass rush.

(lucky to be playing the Raiders this week)

Logical · 09-13-2005, 11:17 AM

Short term Surtain, being as I think him being out could cost us victory in the Raider game.

Long term Roaf as I feel he will impact the offense the most (but Richardson is an extremely close second)

ct · 09-13-2005, 11:31 AM

So updating the list following DV's press conf., says that Surtain and TRich are good to go. That leaves only Roaf and Sims, which is an obvious no-brainer.

Fortunately, Big Willie has improved significantly, so maybe with a week off he'll be back to full strength. Did sound like he's still got a shot to play this week too, and I'll bet he does!!

Sims was playing pretty well, but I don't think we lose too much(if any) to plug in Browning in his place.

Big Slick · 09-13-2005, 11:38 AM

The loss of Sims is only a loss of potential, what we think he MIGHT contribute based on some promising flashes. The other 3 guys are all Pro Bowlers who we know what they bring. Fortunately, it's sounding like the Pro Bowlers should be ok. Hopeful Sims isn't too bad...

View Poll Results: Which injury concerns you most?
Roaf	44	43.14%
Richardson	9	8.82%
Sims	16	15.69%
Surtain	32	31.37%
Bite me, Gaz...I could use an injury myself	1	0.98%
Voters: 102. You may not vote on this poll

09-13-2005, 09:36 AM
Gaz Defense Homer Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Rancho Gaz Casino cash: $10010793	Most Worrisome Injury? I read lots of differing opinions concerning which injury is most worrisome. So let us just poll it up, shall we? xoxo~ Gaz Tossing it up for grabs.
Posts: 5,911

09-13-2005, 09:41 AM	#2
shakesthecat Veteran Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: IA Casino cash: $1853833	I picked Roaf since I think Surtain plays this week. When Roaf went down, the O went south. Black played a little better in the 4th quarter, but Green was running for his life on just about every passing play.
Posts: 3,360

09-13-2005, 09:42 AM	#3
RedThat Banned Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Earth Casino cash: $10004900	Tough one man. It either has to be Roaf or Surtain. Depends on who we play. This week, I think we can get by without Roaf, especially since the Raiders dont have any real pass rush threats, but, without Surtain? And having to cover Porter, Moss, Curry without Surtain, and instead we cover them with McCleon, Washington, and Sapp? fuhhhgeddaboudit!! *Yeah, we need Surtain this week, most definately. We need him more than Roaf.
Posts: 6,666

09-13-2005, 09:43 AM	#4
ChiTown Stroking to the SB Champs! Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Flatlands of Kansas Casino cash: $-481038	Sims I think Roaf is an awfully close second, but we have better depth on the OL than we do at DT. __________________
Posts: 40,917

09-13-2005, 09:55 AM	#5
ct u b illian Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: DooDah Casino cash: $10009436	For me, it is definitely Surtain. But Roaf is a close 2nd.
Posts: 7,287

09-13-2005, 09:56 AM	#6
Redcoats58 MVP Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: Kansas City Mo. Casino cash: $10005055	I would imagine the face of the woman that Larry Johnson backhanded.
Posts: 5,234

09-13-2005, 10:04 AM	#7
Rain Man Seize life. Be an ermine. Join Date: Jul 2001 Location: My house Casino cash: $-612449 VARSITY	My understanding is the Surtain will be back quickly, and that Richardson's problem wasn't serious. That leaves us with Sims and Roaf. Both are worrisome, but losing Roaf for an extended period would be much more damaging at this point. The guy is a national treasure, and hamstring injuries can hang around forever, it seems. __________________ Active fan of the greatest team in NFL history.
Posts: 145,409

09-13-2005, 10:19 AM	#8
Frazod Did you hear what I said? Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $-716615	Roaf being out long term definitely concerns me more than anything else. Surtain being out hurts, but pressure from the improved LB corps will negate that somewhat. All of the offense's success begins and ends with the line. Improved D or no, this is the key to the team's success. As I said last night, thank God we won't be seeing a real defense for the next couple of weeks.
Posts: 121,753

09-13-2005, 11:07 AM	#10
htismaqe 'Tis my eye! Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Chiefsplanet Casino cash: $8149900	Sounds like all of them except for Sims will be ready for the Raiders...which means Sims remains at the top...
Posts: 104,304

09-13-2005, 11:13 AM	#12
trndobrd 'Stachecicle Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: The Tolerance Box Casino cash: $2275087	The consensus opinion was that Trent Green was the most important player for a successful Chiefs season. The loss of Sims, Surtain and Richardson might affect the outcome of a game or two. The loss of Roaf not only limits the running game, but it opens up the possibility of Trent Green getting pounded and possibly injured by a quality pass rush. (lucky to be playing the Raiders this week) __________________
Posts: 7,249

09-13-2005, 11:17 AM	#13
Logical Screw U if U can't take a joke Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $10004900	Short term Surtain, being as I think him being out could cost us victory in the Raider game. Long term Roaf as I feel he will impact the offense the most (but Richardson is an extremely close second)
Posts: 31,579

09-13-2005, 11:31 AM	#14
ct u b illian Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: DooDah Casino cash: $10009436	So updating the list following DV's press conf., says that Surtain and TRich are good to go. That leaves only Roaf and Sims, which is an obvious no-brainer. Fortunately, Big Willie has improved significantly, so maybe with a week off he'll be back to full strength. Did sound like he's still got a shot to play this week too, and I'll bet he does!! Sims was playing pretty well, but I don't think we lose too much(if any) to plug in Browning in his place.
Posts: 7,287

09-13-2005, 11:38 AM	#15
Big Slick Starter Join Date: Apr 2005 Casino cash: $10004925	The loss of Sims is only a loss of potential, what we think he MIGHT contribute based on some promising flashes. The other 3 guys are all Pro Bowlers who we know what they bring. Fortunately, it's sounding like the Pro Bowlers should be ok. Hopeful Sims isn't too bad...
Posts: 88