New US church leader says homosexuality no sin

[FAX]

Originally Posted by bunnytrdr

Amen.

So, Fax. Are you a theologian?

No, Mr. bunnytrdr. Just a guy relentlessly chasing down truth, justice, and good pie wherever that pursuit may lead.

I don't know why I even posted on this dumbass thread. I guess I've just had a bellyfull of the shallow naiveté laid down by some people in an attempt to present themselves as wise and informed.

My biggest concern right now is coming up with the proof necessary to demonstrate that Tony G. actually has redefined the position of tight end in the NFL.

FAX

[Calcountry]

Originally Posted by FAX

No, Mr. bunnytrdr. Just a guy relentlessly chasing down truth, justice, and good pie wherever that pursuit may lead.

I don't know why I even posted on this dumbass thread. I guess I've just had a bellyfull of the shallow naiveté laid down by some people in an attempt to present themselves as wise and informed.

My biggest concern right now is coming up with the proof necessary to demonstrate that Tony G. actually has redefined the position of tight end in the NFL.

FAX

O.K. Mr. Fax, as you wish.

I believe, that it was a confluence of events, of which Tony G happened to be at the center of, that redefined the position.

[FAX]

Originally Posted by bunnytrdr

O.K. Mr. Fax, as you wish.

I believe, that it was a confluence of events, of which Tony G happened to be at the center of, that redefined the position.

That's a pretty interesting thought, actually. Thanks.

I've looked at the stats and, so far at least, am unable to find anything that would reasonably confirm that he did, in fact, redefine the position from a performance standpoint. At first, I thought that he would have had a longer ypc average which would be reflective of greater athleticism, but that's not the case. He's only near the top in that category. Then, I looked at size in the position, but nothing stands out there either.

I hate to admit it, but I think Mr. milkman may turn out to be right about this. Unless, of course, I can construct a compelling argument around your theory.

FAX

[Calcountry]

Originally Posted by FAX

That's a pretty interesting thought, actually. Thanks.

I've looked at the stats and, so far at least, am unable to find anything that would reasonably confirm that he did, in fact, redefine the position from a performance standpoint. At first, I thought that he would have had a longer ypc average which would be reflective of greater athleticism, but that's not the case. He's only near the top in that category. Then, I looked at size in the position, but nothing stands out there either.

I hate to admit it, but I think Mr. milkman may turn out to be right about this. Unless, of course, I can construct a compelling argument around your theory.

FAX

I think the OC's had something to do with the use or utility function of the TG position.

Plus, DV's total lack of concern for the D, and willingness to innovate on a high powered O that fully utilizes a TE, and a workable athlete such as TG and bam, you have a new kind of TE.

[FAX]

Originally Posted by bunnytrdr

I think the OC's had something to do with the use or utility function of the TG position.

Plus, DV's total lack of concern for the D, and willingness to innovate on a high powered O that fully utilizes a TE, and a workable athlete such as TG and bam, you have a new kind of TE.

Well, you're right about all that, Mr. bunnytrdr. Of course TG put up pretty good numbers prior to DV, but you're absolutely correct.

Maybe there's another way for me to address this problem. Perhaps I can claim that TG is the first uncontrollably violent, gun-toting, commie, atheistic, homosexual tight end ever. If that were the case, then I could safely state that he redefined the position.

FAX