Randy Moss

**007** · 12-15-2006, 01:59 AM

I think I would take T.O. before Moss. At least T.O. puts effort into the game on the field. Moss just stands around and does nothing when things aren't going his way.

BWillie · 12-15-2006, 02:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru

I think I would take T.O. before Moss. At least T.O. puts effort into the game on the field. Moss just stands around and does nothing when things aren't going his way.

Definitely. I've never seen TO half ass it before. Moss half asses it about every play when he's pissed off. Moss is the best talent in the game no doubt, I can't imagine how good he'd be if he finally got on a team with Super Bowl hopes. He's a guy that really needs motivation and has alot of sand in his 'giner.

It wouldn't really matter if we had big time receiver anyways. It's not like we throw the ball anyway when we are losing. We just play to not lose the game by alot.

12-15-2006, 01:59 AM	#1
007 Shaken. Not stirred. Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: London Casino cash: $12180126 VARSITY	I think I would take T.O. before Moss. At least T.O. puts effort into the game on the field. Moss just stands around and does nothing when things aren't going his way. __________________ My dear girl, there are some things that just aren’t done. Such as, drinking Dom Perignon ’53 above the temperature of 38 degrees Fahrenheit. That’s just as bad as listening to the Beatles without earmuffs.
Posts: 65,734