|
|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Sound like an idea? | |||
| Great idea. |
   
|
13 | 31.71% |
| Decent, but I'd make a modification or two. |
  
|
16 | 39.02% |
| Oy. Not a good thought. |
  
|
5 | 12.20% |
| Overtime, such as it is, is fine as it is. |
  
|
6 | 14.63% |
| Gaz 'n' shit. |
  
|
1 | 2.44% |
| Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll | |||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-17-2008, 11:18 AM
|
#10 |
|
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Aug 2008
Casino cash: $-1735503
|
Yup. I wrote about this last week and am glad everyone's on board. It makes way too much sense. I'm not sure how I feel about unlimited overtime, though. I think there's a point where you have to just call it a tie.
I'm tired of teams laying up in overtime to play for a field goal. And I'm tired of teams winning on the first possession. The reason, by the way, that you play to 5 and not to 6 is that you want to prevent teams pinned back on the 1 yard line from purposely taking a safety on 4th down instead of punting the ball away to give the other team very good field position. |
|
Posts: 51,658
  |
|
|
|
Overtime suggestion.
Threaded Mode