Stafford or Sanchez?

[suds79]

You know for as much as I've heard people bang on Bradford stating that it's nearly impossible to evaluate him given the talent he's surrounded by, I'm surprised Sanchez seems to get more of a pass on this.

Give me Stafford.

[milkman]

Originally Posted by suds79

You know for as much as I've heard people bang on Bradford stating that it's nearly impossible to evaluate him given the talent he's surrounded by, I'm surprised Sanchez seems to get more of a pass on this.

Give me Stafford.

Sanchez has faced a lot of pressure and taken a lot of hits.

He isn't surrounded by the talent that Bradford was, and he plays in a pro set.

[Chiefnj2]

Originally Posted by milkman

Sanchez has faced a lot of pressure and taken a lot of hits.

He isn't surrounded by the talent that Bradford was, and he plays in a pro set.

Sanchez hasn't faced all that much pressure. How many games was USC down where Sanchez had to bring them back?

08/30/08 @ Virginia W 52-7
09/13/08 9 Ohio St. W 35-3
09/25/08 @ 18 Oregon St. L 21-27
10/04/08 10 Oregon W 44-10
10/11/08 Arizona St. W 28-0
10/18/08 @ Washington St. W 69-0
10/25/08 @ Arizona W 17-10
11/01/08 Washington W 56-0
11/08/08 California W 17-3
11/15/08 @ Stanford W 45-23
11/29/08 Notre Dame W 38-3
12/06/08 @ UCLA W 28-7
01/01/09 + 8 Penn St. W 38-24

He's a hell of a prospect, but almost all of the Bradford criticisms apply to Sanchez. He just doesn't have enough experience to justify a top 10 pick.