HTISMAQE

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by Hootie

I posed this scenario the other day...

Curry at #3...watch Sanchez fall past San Fran...trade up to around #15-#19 range with our 2nd, 3rd and a 2010 2nd...take Sanchez...and wondered if the QB or bust crowd would be happy...(because I think that would be Glenn Dorsey v2 - it was a great feeling on draft day when he fell to us...) but someone told me to stop playing Madden and no one really gave me an answer.

The NFL today values QB's SO much (to the point of insanity really, look at this board, it's a pretty good indicator) that he won't fall that far.

Hell, even the teams with established QB's might look at a guy like that as the next Aaron Rodgers that could sit for 2-3 seasons - like the Seahawks.

[Hootie]

Originally Posted by htismaqe

The NFL today values QB's SO much (to the point of insanity really, look at this board, it's a pretty good indicator) that he won't fall that far.

Hell, even the teams with established QB's might look at a guy like that as the next Aaron Rodgers that could sit for 2-3 seasons - like the Seahawks.

I realize it's very unlikely...but the Browns were taking Quinn at #3...and surely if they didn't there was no way he'd slide past the Dolphins at #9 (Ginn - WTF?!)...

So you never know...

Shit, if you have to sacrifice a 2010 first to get a guy you value as a top QB prospect...you do it, right?

The Browns viewed Quinn as a great QB prospect...so taking him at #21 and giving up a 1st for them was worth it because they definitely would have taken him at #3 if Thomas wasn't available...

If Pioli ABSOLUTELY has to have someone at #3 that isn't Sanchez...but really likes Sanchez more than Thigpen/more than Bradford/more than any QB in 2010...why wouldn't he part with #34, a 3rd and a 2010 1st?

[htismaqe]

Originally Posted by Hootie

I realize it's very unlikely...but the Browns were taking Quinn at #3...and surely if they didn't there was no way he'd slide past the Dolphins at #9 (Ginn - WTF?!)...

So you never know...

Shit, if you have to sacrifice a 2010 first to get a guy you value as a top QB prospect...you do it, right?

The Browns viewed Quinn as a great QB prospect...so taking him at #21 and giving up a 1st for them was worth it because they definitely would have taken him at #3 if Thomas wasn't available...

If Pioli ABSOLUTELY has to have someone at #3 that isn't Sanchez...but really likes Sanchez more than Thigpen/more than Bradford/more than any QB in 2010...why wouldn't he part with #34, a 3rd and a 2010 1st?

That's the nice thing about Pioli. If that is what he wants to do, he'll find a way to do it.