Chiefs Cassel or Sanchez? - Page 13

KCBOSS1 · 04-11-2009, 06:45 PM

I realize that we are where we are, but the more I see about Sanchez, the more I'm afraid that a few years down the road, we may look back and realize that we passed up on the franchise guy that we've been looking for. I know that Cassel played ok last year, but is he a franchise guy? ...likely not. Thoughts?

**DeezNutz** · 04-11-2009, 08:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCBOSS1

Even Grbac looked good there and look how stellar he was for us.

When he started all of 5 games in '95 and 4 games in '96? And he wasn't really worth a shit in '96, too.

CrazyHorse · 04-11-2009, 08:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16

And we didn't win squat with Green and that line.

I'm not interested in building a good team. I'm interested in building a championship team.

Championship teams have to play defense. Ask any great QB.

KCBOSS1 · 04-11-2009, 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyHorse

He choked down the stretch last year. Probably the hangover. Cost Shanny his job.

He's a loose cannnon.

His offense was top 2 or 3 in moving the ball but 16th in scoring.

OK, point well made. But he's a pro bowl quarterback. Don't throw him away as a no-count. The whole scenario is not played out. You may very well be right.

**Reaper16** · 04-11-2009, 08:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyHorse

Championship teams have to play defense. Ask any great QB.

I don't think that having a stout defense and a franchise QB are mutually exclusive.

KCBOSS1 · 04-11-2009, 08:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyHorse

Championship teams have to play defense. Ask any great QB.

Kinda made my point about Cutler here. I'm also for drafting Curry now, by the way.

CrazyHorse · 04-11-2009, 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCBOSS1

Kinda made my point about Cutler here. I'm also for drafting Curry now, by the way.

Great QBs dont throw picks in the red zone. Or get hammered before games. Nor do they throw team mates under the bus after a loss. You dont expect much from your QB I can see. Just throw a fast ball and your "one of the greats".

I would like us to draft Curry if we stay at 3.

Now that we have signed Zack Thomas or LB needs are solved.

What's that all about?

Mecca · 04-11-2009, 08:42 PM

Brett Favre got hammered before games...

KCBOSS1 · 04-11-2009, 08:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

When he started all of 5 games in '95 and 4 games in '96? And he wasn't really worth a shit in '96, too.

I was being sarcastic.....

CrazyHorse · 04-11-2009, 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca

Brett Favre got hammered before games...

Didn't know that. I certainly dont see that as an arguement for success as an NFL QB. It's a problem. That only means he could have been better.

Maybe Cutler will be the next Favre. He definately hasn't "arrived" up to this point. He's looking like the next Jeff George to me. But I've been wrong before.

chiefzilla1501 · 04-11-2009, 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCBOSS1

Kinda made my point about Cutler here. I'm also for drafting Curry now, by the way.

It's a reach to pick any 3-4 ILB in the top 5. I don't understand why people think Curry is a no-brainer. The Chiefs are obviously transitioning into a 3-4 and will probably play it exclusively within the next 2-3 years. Curry is a borderline top 5 pick in a 4-3, but he's an enormous reach in a 3-4.

I realize the options are limited. But I think you get a lot better value with an average nose tackle like Raji or an average 3-4 OLB like Everett Brown than you do with a terrific 3-4 ILB like Curry.

KCBOSS1 · 04-11-2009, 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyHorse

Great QBs dont throw picks in the red zone. Or get hammered before games. Nor do they throw team mates under the bus after a loss. You dont expect much from your QB I can see. Just throw a fast ball and your "one of the greats".

I would like us to draft Curry if we stay at 3.

Now that we have signed Zack Thomas or LB needs are solved.

What's that all about?

I don't think I every said he was "one of the greats".... Just that he was a pro bowler. He's not a bust.

I'm still on board for Curry too. I don't get the Zack Thomas signing at all unless they are looking for a player coach, which may very well be. That would be actually brilliant. Ok, we'll go with that.

Pioli Zombie · 04-11-2009, 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCBOSS1

I realize that we are where we are, but the more I see about Sanchez, the more I'm afraid that a few years down the road, we may look back and realize that we passed up on the franchise guy that we've been looking for. I know that Cassel played ok last year, but is he a franchise guy? ...likely not. Thoughts?

Oh **** me with a broken bottle
Posted via Mobile Device

chiefzilla1501 · 04-11-2009, 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Messier

Really? Do you think moss had a moment after Brady went down that he thought, the season's over, might as well phone in the rest of the season? I'm not saying this happed but it's possible, and as the season went along Moss and the rest of the team saw that Cassel could play well?

I watched Cassel play, and I don't think he was a "system" player, or just relying on the talent around him. He made plays work that weren't working. He wasn't just throwing to wide open receivers all day. He was making accurate passes sometimes on the run, because the o-line wasn't that good for them last year.

The problem is that people assume that because Brady excelled in the system, that means anybody can.

Brady makes that system great. The Pats' o-line is not good. Brady makes them look better because he makes lightning fast reads and can read a blitz from a mile away.

Yes, it's true that players like Moss and Welker are outstanding receivers. But the Pats' o-line is fairly average behind any quarterback not named Tom Brady.

KCBOSS1 · 04-11-2009, 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

It's a reach to pick any 3-4 ILB in the top 5. I don't understand why people think Curry is a no-brainer. The Chiefs are obviously transitioning into a 3-4 and will probably play it exclusively within the next 2-3 years. Curry is a borderline top 5 pick in a 4-3, but he's an enormous reach in a 3-4.

I realize the options are limited. But I think you get a lot better value with an average nose tackle like Raji or an average 3-4 OLB like Everett Brown than you do with a terrific 3-4 ILB like Curry.

#3 is too high of a pick for a nose tackle. It's got to be a game changer type player risk to me, or franchise left tackle, which we may already have like some have said. Curry is a game changer type athlete.

CrazyHorse · 04-11-2009, 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KCBOSS1

OK, point well made. But he's a pro bowl quarterback. Don't throw him away as a no-count. The whole scenario is not played out. You may very well be right.

I see the talent. But think he's over rated. Phillip Rivers should have went to the pro bowl in his place. But there's no doubt Cutler has talent. If he can get his ego under control, you may very well be right. If not, he'll self destruct.

04-11-2009, 06:45 PM
KCBOSS1 RAISE EM RIGHT Join Date: Dec 2005 Location: Arkansas Casino cash: $10005366	Cassel or Sanchez? I realize that we are where we are, but the more I see about Sanchez, the more I'm afraid that a few years down the road, we may look back and realize that we passed up on the franchise guy that we've been looking for. I know that Cassel played ok last year, but is he a franchise guy? ...likely not. Thoughts?
Posts: 1,927

04-11-2009, 08:42 PM	#187
Mecca Hockey Town Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Kansas City, Missouri Casino cash: $-562950	Brett Favre got hammered before games...
Posts: 115,291