Chiefs Chiefs tried to trade Charles

'Hamas' Jenkins · 01-04-2010, 01:58 PM

Given the weapons he has, he's a mediocre ass quarterback. I don't think he's a leader, and I question his physical tools. He's got good size, but he's not very accurate, and his arm strength isn't special. He's careless with the football, always has been, and he locks on to his primary read far too often, and he makes his worst decisions in the biggest moments.

There are probably 10-12 QBs I'd take over him, right now.

I still stand by that.

Hootie · 01-04-2010, 01:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

Given the weapons he has, he's a mediocre ass quarterback. I don't think he's a leader, and I question his physical tools. He's got good size, but he's not very accurate, and his arm strength isn't special. He's careless with the football, always has been, and he locks on to his primary read far too often, and he makes his worst decisions in the biggest moments.

There are probably 10-12 QBs I'd take over him, right now.

I still stand by that.

that is a direct contradiction of this one:

"Tony Romo is the one of the worst starting QBs in the NFL. If Dallas had a competent QB last week, they would have put up another 10-14 points. Dude is flat out taint."

What do you know...Hamas the hypocrite!

'Hamas' Jenkins · 01-04-2010, 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hootie

that is a direct contradiction of this one:

"Tony Romo is the one of the worst starting QBs in the NFL. If Dallas had a competent QB last week, they would have put up another 10-14 points. Dude is flat out taint."

What do you know...Hamas the hypocrite!

For me to be a hypocrite, I'd have to have supported Romo. Never did. Always thought he was a mediocre QB (or worse). Still do.

He has weapons all over the place, but he's basically Neil Lomax.

I'm glad that you probably picked him up off the wire in 2006 and won a fantasy title because of it, but I really don't ****ing care about your fanboi obsessions.

He ****ing sucks, end of story, and just like Favre, it's time for him to come up smallest.

**AustinChief** · 01-04-2010, 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins

For me to be a hypocrite, I'd have to have supported Romo. Never did. Always thought he was a mediocre QB (or worse). Still do.

He has weapons all over the place, but he's basically Neil Lomax.

Dude that's not fair on Neil Lomax..

Roy Green? Pat Tilley? JT Smith?

Terrell Owens... Terry Glenn... Jason Witten... Ro Williams... Miles Austin...

With CRAP Lomax still put up a 4600 yard season in 1984.

Romo has yet to do that with a freaking all star lineup around him.

**OnTheWarpath15** · 01-04-2010, 02:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief

Dude that's not fair on Neil Lomax..

Roy Green? Pat Tilley? JT Smith?

Terrell Owens... Terry Glenn... Jason Witten... Ro Williams... Miles Austin...

With CRAP Lomax still put up a 4600 yard season in 1984.

Romo has yet to do that with a freaking all star lineup around him.

Damn, Kyle breaking out the old STL Cardinals history.

01-04-2010, 01:58 PM	#1
'Hamas' Jenkins Now you've pissed me off! Join Date: Jan 2006 Casino cash: $7129572	Given the weapons he has, he's a mediocre ass quarterback. I don't think he's a leader, and I question his physical tools. He's got good size, but he's not very accurate, and his arm strength isn't special. He's careless with the football, always has been, and he locks on to his primary read far too often, and he makes his worst decisions in the biggest moments. There are probably 10-12 QBs I'd take over him, right now. I still stand by that. __________________ "When the Know-Nothings get control, it will read 'all men are created equal, except negroes, and foreigners, and Catholics.' When it comes to this I should prefer emigrating to some country where they make no pretense of loving liberty – to Russia, for instance, where despotism can be taken pure, and without the base alloy of hypocrisy.”--Abraham Lincoln
Posts: 75,083