Gretz:Free Agent Review #2 … Friday Cup O’Chiefs

[tomahawk kid]

Blob comes off as a little bitter in these articles me thinks.......

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by tomahawk kid

Blob comes off as a little bitter in these articles me thinks.......

So you're implying that these acquisitions are better than they appear?

[tomahawk kid]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

So you're implying that these acquisitions are better than they appear?

No - I just think its sorta harsh assigning "F's" to guys that were signed mid-season to be role players.

It's really no skin off my nose either way, just came off as sorta bitter to me.

[DaneMcCloud]

Originally Posted by tomahawk kid

No - I just think its sorta harsh assigning "F's" to guys that were signed mid-season to be role players.

It's really no skin off my nose either way, just came off as sorta bitter to me.

There were only two mid-season F's: Lance Long and Kenny Smith.

Trading Tank Tyler for a 5th and replacing him with a guy that hadn't played a full season since 2003 deserves an F.

Lance Long was signed to the practice squad, where he spent several weeks before being called up. Haley apparently game-planned around him because he was thrown more balls than Wade or Bowe at one point and he failed.

I think both deserve an F.

And for what it's worth, I don't think he's calling the players themselves "F's", I think he's calling the acquisition of these players and their subsequent contributions an F.

I don't see how that's debatable, considering the results.

[tomahawk kid]

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

There were only two mid-season F's: Lance Long and Kenny Smith.

Trading Tank Tyler for a 5th and replacing him with a guy that hadn't played a full season since 2003 deserves an F.

Lance Long was signed to the practice squad, where he spent several weeks before being called up. Haley apparently game-planned around him because he was thrown more balls than Wade or Bowe at one point and he failed.

I think both deserve an F.

And for what it's worth, I don't think he's calling the players themselves "F's", I think he's calling the acquisition of these players and their subsequent contributions an F.

I don't see how that's debatable, considering the results.

You don't think that's debatable?

I wouldn't have picked that up from your comments above?

Are you related to Bob in some way?

I'm kidding BTW......