Who should we draft 1st?

[KCChiefsMan]

who should it be?

[Coogs]

Originally Posted by Tribal Warfare

From the "SIC" the main trade partner if Clausen and Berry are there is Cleveland and they'll select Berry and KC will pick Clausen.

I could live with that. But damn, I would love to have them both.

[JD10367]

Originally Posted by RJ

Well, Detroit has that Stafford guy....

Who had worse stats last year than Cassel. So did Sanchez.

Let's face it. The Cassel-Haters who think he's a suckbag want Clausen. The people who think Cassel's not that bad want Berry.

So they'll probably draft Okung, LOL.

[Reaper16]

Originally Posted by JD10367

Who had worse stats last year than Cassel. So did Sanchez.

Let's face it. The Cassel-Haters who think he's a suckbag want Clausen. The people who think Cassel's not that bad want Berry.

So they'll probably draft Okung, LOL.

Okung won't be there at #5 anyway.

This run-up to the draft on the Planet has been much better than last year. Why? Because most people, even the dummies who think Cassel is the answer at QB, think that Berry should be the pick. Those of us who would want Clausen can't call the pro-Berry posters idiots because Berry would be a great pick for the Chiefs. Last year I was all "If you want Curry then I want you dead, mother****er." This year I'm all "You don't want Clausen? Who the **** do you want then? Berry, you say? Oh, well, sure. That's fine."

[JD10367]

Originally Posted by Reaper16

Okung won't be there at #5 anyway.

This run-up to the draft on the Planet has been much better than last year. Why? Because most people, even the dummies who think Cassel is the answer at QB, think that Berry should be the pick. Those of us who would want Clausen can't call the pro-Berry posters idiots because Berry would be a great pick for the Chiefs. Last year I was all "If you want Curry then I want you dead, mother****er." This year I'm all "You don't want Clausen? Who the **** do you want then? Berry, you say? Oh, well, sure. That's fine."

"With the fifth pick in the draft, the Kansas City Chiefs select Tim Tebow."

:::sound of shotguns ratcheting all across Kansas and Missouri:::

[Bwana]

Berry

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by Sure-Oz

Bob Fescoe doesn't want Berry so all the more reason i want him at 5

Does he actually give a reason for it...I'd love to hear that dumbassery at work.

[boogblaster]

We really need impact play-makers .. so I guess Berry is the one ready to help us from day one ...

[whoman69]

Originally Posted by ChiefRon

OMG. Unbelievable. Same ol' CP.

55% want Berry? Over Clausen (31%)?

Are you kidding me?

Unbelievable.

Let's review.

Rule #1 - You DO NOT pass on a potential franchise QB if you do not currently have one.

We currently do not have one.

If we pass on another potential franchise QB AGAIN, our front office should be replaced AGAIN.

I think that tells you most here don't consider Clausen to be a franchise QB.

[Mecca]

Originally Posted by whoman69

I think that tells you most here don't consider Clausen to be a franchise QB.

Or don't think the Chiefs will realistically make the pick.

[Fritz88]

where the **** is tebow?

[Brock]

Berry over Clausen is okay with me. People who voted Okung should be castrated though.

[whoman69]

Originally Posted by Mecca

Or don't think the Chiefs will realistically make the pick.

The question is clearly who should we draft first, not who do you think we'll draft first.

[Mecca]

Look now they should take Clausen because Cassel isn't the guy but there's no way this front office believes that yet.

I will pass out if they take Clausen.

[notorious]

Only 11% are taking Okung?!



The dumb-**** percentage has to be much higher than that......

[teedubya]

So KCCHIEFSMAN, who do you think we should draft? :-P