UFO's.. I'm a little less skeptical now !

[Fish]

Originally Posted by petegz28

The "mutilated" animals are a very, very interesting topic. The precision of the injuries really negates the word "mutilated". Blood pumped from the animals? Precise removal of organs. Cauterized incisions. No animal is doing that to another animal. Either there are some poor scientists out there that are having to do this to animals to get materials for their research or something else we have no clue about is doing it. And I would think if it were indeed humans doing this there would be some trace evidence of their being there. Tire marks, footprints, etc, etc.

So the aliens are coming thousands of light years to secretly steal our beef now?

I can see it now... golden arches discovered just past Neptune...

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by KC Fish

So the aliens are coming thousands of light years to secretly steal our beef now?

I can see it now... golden arches discovered just past Neptune...

Beef? Pay attention. They are leaving most of the animal intact. Whoever is doing this is draining the blood and removing organs. Nothing else. Very little if any meat is gone. And what does seem to be gone seems to be done after the fact by scavengers.

[Fish]

Originally Posted by petegz28

Beef? Pay attention. They are leaving most of the animal intact. Whoever is doing this is draining the blood and removing organs. Nothing else. Very little if any meat is gone. And what does seem to be gone seems to be done after the fact by scavengers.

I'm not sure where you're getting this info, but I don't really believe it. There have been many investigations into livestock mutilation, and every legitimate one has concluded that there is absolutely no evidence of anything other than natural life and death processes. One of the more famous is from a fella named Ken Rommel, who was an ex FBI agent hired by New Mexico to investigate the issue. He investigated all sorts of mutilations that had been described as "laser cut incisions" and "total blood removal", and found that it was all a bunch of BS.

You should read some of the report. It goes into very specific detail about why these cases are generally overblown and exaggerated.

Here's the full report: http://dagmar.lunarpages.com/~parasc2/articles/0597/romindex.htm

It includes pics from animals he investigated that were claimed to be cut by lasers and other such craziness.

Here's a good excerpt:

In his report, Rommel painstakingly debunks many of the notions about "classic mutilations." In almost all of the cases he examined, a completely natural cause of death was established. The organs that disappear, he argues, are composed of just the sort of soft tissues that carnivorous scavengers are known to snack on. The "surgically precise" cuts that were so often reported were in fact quite jagged when viewed up close. As to the absence of blood, Rommel notes that "such a claim is rarely substantiated by a necropsy [animal autopsy] report." He discovered that it is common for the blood of deceased animals to settle into the lower parts of the corpse, and that "any blood on the carcass or on the ground is quickly consumed by scavengers."

Rommel didn't find evidence of a criminal conspiracy, but he did identify some culprits. His chief suspect was the mute rumor mill, aided and abetted by some news outlets and law officers who put unfounded conclusions on the record. Rommel said that he found "a great deal of very creative writing on the part of the media and some law enforcement personnel and I found many statements made by others that were completely unsupported by factual data." His research, he asserted, had "clearly shown that the media has played a very important role in promoting both the livestock phenomenon and the lore surrounding it." Rommel concluded that misleading reports had bred "a classic case of mild hysteria" around the mute issue.

He recently remarked: "The problem is, you've got ranchers who see something they've never seen before or just ignored, and then you have law-enforcement officials getting carried away. You've got Sheriff Num-nutz up in some place where he can't even find his own police car, saying, 'It looks like laser surgery,' and the reporters love quotes like that, so they repeat it. Now, if I were a reporter, I would ask, 'Sheriff, how much do you know about laser surgery?'"

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by KC Fish

I'm not sure where you're getting this info, but I don't really believe it. There have been many investigations into livestock mutilation, and every legitimate one has concluded that there is absolutely no evidence of anything other than natural life and death processes. One of the more famous is from a fella named Ken Rommel, who was an ex FBI agent hired by New Mexico to investigate the issue. He investigated all sorts of mutilations that had been described as "laser cut incisions" and "total blood removal", and found that it was all a bunch of BS.

You should read some of the report. It goes into very specific detail about why these cases are generally overblown and exaggerated.

Here's the full report: http://dagmar.lunarpages.com/~parasc2/articles/0597/romindex.htm

It includes pics from animals he investigated that were claimed to be cut by lasers and other such craziness.

Here's a good excerpt:

I say, BS. No pun intended.

[Fish]

Originally Posted by petegz28

I say, BS. No pun intended.

Yeah... it's much more likely that aliens come to Earth to carve out cow ass with lasers.......

[petegz28]

Originally Posted by KC Fish

Yeah... it's much more likely that aliens come to Earth to carve out cow ass with lasers.......

That's more believable than some predator with laser eyes.

[Fish]

Originally Posted by petegz28

That's more believable than some predator with laser eyes.

Laser eyes? Ha.... yeah...

Have you ever seen the carcass of a bovine that's been laying in the sun for a few days? Have you ever seen first hand what predators and scavengers can do to a carcass? I think it's pretty obvious you never have.