Rutgers freshman suicide after roommate broadcast gay sexual encounter online?

[patteeu]

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut

She'll have a license to enter the premises.

That license will be for a particular purpose - for cleaning.

If she goes beyond the purpose of the license, she has no expecation.

If, however, she's the lessor of the premises, she has a full expectation of privacy. If she's given a license to both clean and **** on the coffee table (presumably this would need to be an express license as I can't imagine any scenario where one would be implied), she would then have an expectation of privacy as to the ****ing, but not as to making meth in the basement.

This is very very very very VERY simple and folks are coming up with really stupid hypotheticals in an attempt to justify the unjustifiable.

This area of law is so well settled that its comical. This kid has an expectation of privacy and it was clearly invaded.

It's like trying to teach math to a monkey.

The issue I have with you and the other members of the pitchfork-wielding mob isn't so much whether this is a violation of law as it is with the appropriate level of punishment.