Three reasons the Chiefs choke and miss the playoffs.

[BigRock]

Originally Posted by Gif Horse

Besides, who cares about injuries?

...you? Aren't you the one who made a point of bringing up the Garrard injury to downplay that win? I'm pretty sure it was you.

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by BigRock

...you? Aren't you the one who made a point of bringing up the Garrard injury to downplay that win? I'm pretty sure it was you.

I think we can all agree there's a difference in an injury to a starting QB vs a tight end or a wide receiver.

The Chiefs blew out the Jags because Bouman couldn't do crap in the second half of that game.

The Chargers blew out the Chiefs because they were a legit better team.

Clear?

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by Gif Horse

I think we can all agree there's a difference in an injury to a starting QB vs a tight end or a wide receiver.

The Chiefs blew out the Jags because Bouman couldn't do crap in the second half of that game.

The Chargers blew out the Chiefs because they were a legit better team.

Clear?

Okay, so the Chiefs' win doesn't count because Bowman played like crap in the second half.

But the Chargers win counts in spite of Croyle playing like worse crap in the first AND second half.

Got it.

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

Okay, so the Chiefs' win doesn't count because Bowman played like crap in the second half.

But the Chargers win counts in spite of Croyle playing like worse crap in the first AND second half.

Got it.

I think it's pretty obvious Bouman cost the Jaguars that game. They were in it until he self destructed.

The Chiefs were getting their asses kicked on both sides of the ball for the entire game against San Diego. Huge, huge difference.

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by Gif Horse

I think it's pretty obvious Bouman cost the Jaguars that game. They were in it until he self destructed.

The Chiefs were getting their asses kicked on both sides of the ball for the entire game against San Diego. Huge, huge difference.

The Jaguars were not running the ball well that game. Their defense played like shit. Todd Bouman was the only reason the Jags were in that game. The Chiefs dominated the Jags in every facet of the game but the pass defense.
At least Todd Bouman gave the Jags a half. Brodie Croyle didn't even give the Chiefs a minute.

By the way, at this point, Cassel > Garrard. Bouman >> Croyle. The QB gap is far more significant. It's not like Garrard is head and shoulders better than Bouman. Far from it.

Croyle played negatively. Jamarcus Russell negatively. Don't act like Croyle starting didn't have any impact on the game. We still don't know how the Chiefs would have fared with Cassel in the lineup. Different gameplan, different game if the Chiefs convert for first downs, rested defense. We don't know.

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

Todd Bouman was the only reason the Jags were in that game.

Shows you how fraudulent the Chiefs are. And as we saw, a real QB like Philip Rivers was no match.

[Coogs]

Originally Posted by Gif Horse

Shows you how fraudulent the Chiefs are. And as we saw, a real QB like Philip Rivers was no match.

Dude. We beat the Chargers with Rivers.

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by Gif Horse

Shows you how fraudulent the Chiefs are. And as we saw, a real QB like Philip Rivers was no match.

Just because the Chargers played like they were supposed to play (given that they have drafted well for 10 years) doesn't prove that the Chiefs are fraudulent. It just proves that the Chargers' early season losses were fraudulent.

The Chiefs are outperforming expectations. The Chargers are wildly underperforming expectations.

Stop trying to act like the Chiefs should somehow be scolded for not being as good as the Chargers. They're not supposed to be.

[Coogs]

Originally Posted by Gif Horse

I think we can all agree there's a difference in an injury to a starting QB vs a tight end or a wide receiver.

The Chiefs blew out the Jags because Bouman couldn't do crap in the second half of that game.

The Chargers blew out the Chiefs because they were a legit better team.

Clear?

So Chiefs beat San Diego with Rivers... and that does not qualify as a legit win?

Yet the Bolts beat the Chiefs with Croyle at the helm, and that does qualify as a legit win... but when the Cheifs win over Jax with Bouman QB'ing it does not.

[Norman Einstein]

Originally Posted by Gif Horse

I think we can all agree there's a difference in an injury to a starting QB vs a tight end or a wide receiver.

The Chiefs blew out the Jags because Bouman couldn't do crap in the second half of that game.

The Chargers blew out the Chiefs because they were a legit better team.

Clear?

What's clear here is that you can say Jacksonville lost because Garrard wasn't there but when the Chiefs lose Cassel it's because SD was better?

That's sticking your foot in your mouth again.