|
|
01-02-2011, 07:13 PM | #1 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Olathe, Ks
Casino cash: $2404127
|
Quote:
The Jets had the harder schedule. |
|
Posts: 128,326
|
01-02-2011, 07:17 PM | #2 | |
I'll be back.
Join Date: Nov 2002
Casino cash: $4320478
|
Quote:
Pete, I know you are a reerun but please, please try to understand. Games against teams with winning records: Jets - 6 Ravens - 7 Wins against teams with winning records: Jets - 2 Ravens - 4 Also, the Ravens beat the Jets. WITHOUT QUESTION...they are a better football team.
__________________
Chiefs game films |
|
Posts: 279,008
|
01-02-2011, 07:18 PM | #3 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Olathe, Ks
Casino cash: $2404127
|
Quote:
And the Jets had a harder schedule, dumbass. |
|
Posts: 128,326
|
01-02-2011, 07:19 PM | #4 |
I'll be back.
Join Date: Nov 2002
Casino cash: $4320478
|
No, they didn't.
The played fewer games against teams with winning records. And they had a losing record against teams with winning records.
__________________
Chiefs game films |
Posts: 279,008
|
01-02-2011, 07:23 PM | #5 |
oxymoron
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: OP/KC/Whatever
Casino cash: $9556299
|
It's kind of a six of one/half dozen of the other question when you're comparing the Jets to Baltimore. They're both defensive teams that run the ball behind unproven quarterbacks, although I think Flacco is much more dangerous (to us) than Sanchez (who can be dangerous to the Jets).
Honestly half the reason I wanted the Jets is so that we could watch Cassel beat Sanchez. It would have been poetic. But Baltimore is who we got. I think we'll actually win the game. Today was an aberration, and I think people are jumping off the boat too quickly, including the national media. Last edited by keg in kc; 01-02-2011 at 07:29 PM.. |
Posts: 58,682
|
|
|