Chiefs NBC Sunday Night Footbal says "Everyone wants to play KC @ Home" - Page 4

**petegz28** · 01-02-2011, 06:54 PM

That's locker room material there.

tonyetony · 01-02-2011, 07:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief

This team has been nothing more than a false sense of security this season.

Can you remember a team that won their division that had a 2-4 division record? This team greatly benefited from playing a horribly weak schedule, while the other AFCW teams shit their pants early on. The people tired of hearing that will say "Well we don't control who plays who, we just play our schedule, let's just worry about this year."

That's fine.

But the harsh truth is we played only 2 teams that posted a winning record this season and lost to both of them. We did beat SD once, but my bet would be if conditions weren't shitty on a loud/crazy MNF game at the "new" Arrowhead with the pregame fireworks show jacking up all the fans, SD might have won that game. But it is what it is. It doesn't help that we got SHUT OUT at their place. The real SD showed up then.

Look who KC plays next season in non divisional games...
GB
CHI
NE
NYJ
IND
PIT

Right there is probably 6 losses if all of those teams are healthy and barring any major inj to the QB etc. And that's not even counting SDx2 OAK x2 and we still have to play @DEN which we are notorious for going up there and losing. I am very well expecting a losing season next year just on the schedule and who we have to play.

It's good the stars aligned. SD's shitty first qtr of the season performance was the reason they didn't win the division. KC's first qrt performance against some shitty teams was the reason they jumped out in front of the other teams in the AFCW, while everyone else lost. The other teams helped KC win the title. It is what it is....but KC isn't ready to play with the big boys, not by a long shot.

Be done with it and slit your wrists already.

Bambi · 01-02-2011, 07:49 PM

The Chiefs are the worst team in the playoffs (except for the NFC West winner obviously).

Who wouldn't want to play them??

Deberg_1990 · 01-02-2011, 07:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru

fortunately nobody gives a shit what NBC says

Except a bunch of Chiefs fans on this board apparantly or this thread wouldnt have 46 posts.

heh, i dont get why so many people on here care what these dudes say? They dont know anymore than the rest of us.

Reerun_KC · 01-02-2011, 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58

Seriously.

This has to be the most insecure fanbase in the NFL.

Oh noes, East Coast bias.

Oh noes, the media said blah, blah, blah.

Oh noes, the refs are always out to get us.

Ironic coming from you.. You were one of the most negative people against everything Chiefs before this season...

I still find it hard to believe that you actually root for the Chiefs to win...

No sarcasm here either....

donkhater · 01-02-2011, 08:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief

ARZ was playing well at the end of the season.

We got beat by a very horribly disciplined football team. OAK came into Arrowhead and pushed us around on both sides of the ball.

What makes people think the Ravens arent going to do the same? They're 5x the better team than OAK.

Well, Arizona got beat 47-7 by a Matt Cassell-led Patriot team in week 16 that year (the Pats didn't go to the playoffs if you remember). AND 35-14 by Minnesota at home in week 15 of that season. If you call that playing well, then KC is on fire.

KCwolf · 01-02-2011, 08:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy

Got it. Next year is finished already, this year was a complete joke.

Some of you seriously need kill yourselves by jumping off a high building, or just drown yourself in acid so the funeral expenses won't be too much for the happy people you'll leave behind.

I couldn't agree more......jump off the bandwagon NOW and please join the "NBC Favorite Team of the Week" Message Board

Marcellus · 01-02-2011, 08:11 PM

Bring it on bitches, bring it on.

donkhater · 01-02-2011, 08:17 PM

Baltimore is not 5 x better than Oakland. More consistent? Yes. But a motivated Oakland team can play with nearly any team in the league.

Kidd Lex · 01-02-2011, 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by donkhater

Baltimore is not 5 x better than Oakland. More consistent? Yes. But a motivated Oakland team can play with nearly any team in the league.

Thankfully Al Davis is going to blow it up again...

WilliamTheIrish · 01-02-2011, 08:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief

Right.... strength of schedule and SD's slow ass start had nothing to do with KC's end result as AFCW champs.

If you took this year's team with next year's schedule i can certainly guarantee you we wouldn't be close to winning 10 games.

"The Official COMO Prediction Thread". (Open 24 hours).

Mr_Tomahawk · 01-02-2011, 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by donkhater

Baltimore is not 5 x better than Oakland. More consistent? Yes. But a motivated Oakland team can play with nearly any team in the league.

This....sort of.

I will say Oakland is one of the most physical teams when they are on their game. They seem to physically beat the $hit out of their opponent every week. Whether they win or not is another story.

That said...I do not see Baltimore showing us anything more physical than what we saw from Oakland both games. They just are...smarter with it.

donkhater · 01-02-2011, 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief

ARZ was playing well at the end of the season.

Actually upon closer inspection, the end of the 2008 season wasn't so hot for Arizona prior to their SB run:

Week 12: L, 37-29 to NYG
Week 13: L, 48-20 to PHI
Week 14: W, 34-10 vs StL
Week 15: L, 35-14 to MIN
Week 16: L, 47-7 to NE
Week 17: W, 34-21 to SEA

So they went 2-4 to end the season, getting blown out 3 times by greater margins than KC did today.

Poor example, CoMoChief

WilliamTheIrish · 01-02-2011, 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by donkhater

y.

Poor example, CoMoChief

As usual. The only thing the guy has ever picked correct is his nose.

**Smed1065** · 01-02-2011, 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CoMoChief

Right.... strength of schedule and SD's slow ass start had nothing to do with KC's end result as AFCW champs.

If you took this year's team with next year's schedule i can certainly guarantee you we wouldn't be close to winning 10 games.

Guess we just have to win the most next year? No?

JD10367 · 01-02-2011, 08:45 PM

Not really sure why they would say "everyone wants to play KC at home". The "everyone" was really a choice between either the Jets or the Ravens, neither of which really had a say in the matter. It would've been more apropos to say that "everyone wants to play the Jets in their own house", as both KC and Indy were fighting for that easy matchup.

The Ravens probably preferred to play the Chiefs only because of their playoff inexperience but, honestly, the Colts probably would've been an easier game for Baltimore (even with Melonhead). The Jets are ****ed either way so it didn't matter where they went.

01-02-2011, 06:54 PM
petegz28 Supporter Join Date: Feb 2005 Location: Olathe, Ks Casino cash: $-985873	NBC Sunday Night Footbal says "Everyone wants to play KC @ Home" That's locker room material there.
Posts: 132,394

01-02-2011, 07:49 PM	#47
Bambi Banned Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: New York City Casino cash: $10036993	The Chiefs are the worst team in the playoffs (except for the NFC West winner obviously). Who wouldn't want to play them??
Posts: 17,810

01-02-2011, 08:11 PM	#52
Marcellus Diablo Negro Join Date: Sep 2003 Casino cash: $-417338	Bring it on bitches, bring it on.
Posts: 74,323

01-02-2011, 08:17 PM	#53
donkhater Brilliant!! Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: Indiana, USA Casino cash: $10014051	Baltimore is not 5 x better than Oakland. More consistent? Yes. But a motivated Oakland team can play with nearly any team in the league. __________________ The welfare of humanity is always the alibi of tyrants
Posts: 3,994

01-02-2011, 08:45 PM	#60
JD10367 Cheaterlover* Join Date: May 2009 Location: RI Casino cash: $10010716	Not really sure why they would say "everyone wants to play KC at home". The "everyone" was really a choice between either the Jets or the Ravens, neither of which really had a say in the matter. It would've been more apropos to say that "everyone wants to play the Jets in their own house", as both KC and Indy were fighting for that easy matchup. The Ravens probably preferred to play the Chiefs only because of their playoff inexperience but, honestly, the Colts probably would've been an easier game for Baltimore (even with Melonhead). The Jets are ****ed either way so it didn't matter where they went.
Posts: 12,916