NFL Draft 3 NFL draft scenarios - Page 3

**AustinChief** · 12-29-2011, 07:02 PM

Which of the following three (all unlikely) scenarios would you prefer... if you HAD to pick one of them.

#1 Chiefs trade 2012 1st and 2nd picks and 2013 1st and 2nd to move up enough spots to grab RGIII

#2 Matt Kalil somehow slides to the Chiefs at the #10 spot

#3 Chiefs take Trent Richardson at #10

tredadda · 12-29-2011, 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Okie_Apparition

Any QB that jumps from meh to top 3 in a few months
ain't worth two year's 1s & 2s

So you wouldn't do that for Cam Newton? He was playing at a JC the year before he won it all at Auburn. Granted he was talented and went there due to other reasons, but even if he had stayed at Florida it is highly doubtful he would have unseated Tebow. Players do get better. They can go from MEH to superstar overnight.

**hometeam** · 12-29-2011, 09:27 PM

I picked option 1, but I dont see the chiefs having to give up all of that to move up the few spots needed to grab him.

tredadda · 12-29-2011, 09:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hometeam

I picked option 1, but I dont see the chiefs having to give up all of that to move up the few spots needed to grab him.

Its really only a first and 2 seconds. That is not that much to give up really for either of these guys. I think too many see two firsts but fail to realize if we trade our first this year we are essentially just trading draft position so it is a push.

'Hamas' Jenkins · 12-29-2011, 10:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rain Man

I want a franchise QB as much as anybody, but 2 1sts and 2 2nds is too much.

1) Then you don't because
2) It isn't

Dr. Gigglepants · 12-29-2011, 10:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Okie_Apparition

Any QB that jumps from meh to top 3 in a few months
ain't worth two year's 1s & 2s

He's been top 3 for a long time. The first Thursday night college game of the season was an RGIII hype fest versus TCU. This has been in the works since last year.

Thig Lyfe · 12-29-2011, 10:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ILChief

I'm leery of RG3 as an NFL QB. For Luck or Barkley, I'd do it.

Racist.

malachi47000 · 12-29-2011, 10:35 PM

My choice would be do give up the draft picks and go for the QB. Clearly they have a lot of solid pieces and with a couple decent free agent pickups along with the draft I think that the Chiefs could afford to give up next years 1st and 2nd.....Problem however is that Pioli will not give up that many draft picks on a hunch. Haley has already been shown the door and if Pioli doesn't do well in the next year or two, he will be shown the door as well. I think he tries to play it safe as possible and goes with B.P.A. instead.

Frankie · 12-29-2011, 10:57 PM

I would trade down and get someone like Tannehill* at value + some extra picks.

(* = If he does well in the post season.)

Chiefaholic · 12-30-2011, 02:29 AM

As much as I'd hate to miss out on future draft picks, we NEED a franchise QB. It's a risk I'd be willing to take, expecially if it were Luck rather than RGIII

**007** · 12-30-2011, 02:46 AM

none of those scenarios will even happen.

**AustinChief** · 12-30-2011, 02:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Guru

none of those scenarios will even happen.

probably not, it was a poll built to gauge how far people want to go for a qb

hence why I stated they were unlikely.

**007** · 12-30-2011, 03:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by AustinChief

probably not, it was a poll built to gauge how far people want to go for a qb

hence why I stated they were unlikely.

Personally, I think half the STH base could abandon their tickets next year stating it is because we still have Cassel and the Pioli still would not draft a QB.

Chiefnj2 · 12-30-2011, 08:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CrazyCoffey

Don't you think the team is pretty young already? why not keep young players and trade the picks?
That is provide the QB is really worth the trade. And I don't really know for sure that any of them are.

I would keep those players. I was using them as an example of what you'd be losing if you traded the picks for the player. I could have used 2009 instead, but that would have made it a very easy decision.

CaliforniaChief · 12-30-2011, 08:15 AM

#1. We could use our cap space and middle/lower round picks to build the line/depth. We should pay whatever it takes to get a QB.

Sofa King · 12-30-2011, 08:15 AM

If you didn't pick trade up for RGIII then you are one hateful mother ****er.

View Poll Results: pick one of these 3 NFL draft scenarios
Chiefs trade 2012 1st and 2nd picks and 2013 1st and 2nd to move up enough spots to grab RGIII	73	61.34%
Matt Kalil somehow slides to the Chiefs at the #10 spot	17	14.29%
Chiefs take Trent Richardson at #10	13	10.92%
Trade down, WAY down and draft Gaz.	16	13.45%
Voters: 119. You may not vote on this poll

12-29-2011, 07:02 PM
AustinChief Administrator Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Austin Casino cash: $-664998	3 NFL draft scenarios Which of the following three (all unlikely) scenarios would you prefer... if you HAD to pick one of them. #1 Chiefs trade 2012 1st and 2nd picks and 2013 1st and 2nd to move up enough spots to grab RGIII #2 Matt Kalil somehow slides to the Chiefs at the #10 spot #3 Chiefs take Trent Richardson at #10
Posts: 20,016

12-29-2011, 09:27 PM	#32
hometeam Supporter Join Date: Jul 2011 Casino cash: $1531956	I picked option 1, but I dont see the chiefs having to give up all of that to move up the few spots needed to grab him.
Posts: 10,765

12-29-2011, 10:35 PM	#37
malachi47000 Rock Chalk Jayhawk, GO KU!!!! Join Date: Apr 2006 Casino cash: $9834937	My choice would be do give up the draft picks and go for the QB. Clearly they have a lot of solid pieces and with a couple decent free agent pickups along with the draft I think that the Chiefs could afford to give up next years 1st and 2nd.....Problem however is that Pioli will not give up that many draft picks on a hunch. Haley has already been shown the door and if Pioli doesn't do well in the next year or two, he will be shown the door as well. I think he tries to play it safe as possible and goes with B.P.A. instead.
Posts: 355

12-29-2011, 10:57 PM	#38
Frankie Banned Join Date: Jul 2001 Casino cash: $10004900	I would trade down and get someone like Tannehill* at value + some extra picks. (* = If he does well in the post season.)
Posts: 26,959

12-30-2011, 02:29 AM	#39
Chiefaholic Veteran Join Date: Aug 2000 Casino cash: $520277	As much as I'd hate to miss out on future draft picks, we NEED a franchise QB. It's a risk I'd be willing to take, expecially if it were Luck rather than RGIII __________________
Posts: 4,831

12-30-2011, 02:46 AM	#40
007 Shaken. Not stirred. Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: London Casino cash: $12190126 VARSITY	none of those scenarios will even happen.
Posts: 65,734

12-30-2011, 08:15 AM	#44
CaliforniaChief #RIPAce Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: So Cal Casino cash: $10595899	#1. We could use our cap space and middle/lower round picks to build the line/depth. We should pay whatever it takes to get a QB.
Posts: 17,457

12-30-2011, 08:15 AM	#45
Sofa King Bump it Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: South Dakota Casino cash: $-320000 VARSITY	If you didn't pick trade up for RGIII then you are one hateful mother ****er.
Posts: 23,465