Quinn QBotF

[BoneKrusher]

i jumped on the Quinn Bandwagon because i do NOT wanna sit through another season of three yard passes and game stats like: 15/20 for 90 yards and 3 ints.

i'll say this, "Anyone But Cassel" for the season ahead.

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by BoneKrusher

i jumped on the Quinn Bandwagon because i do NOT wanna sit through another season of three yard passes and game stats like: 15/20 for 90 yards and 3 ints.

That's Brady Quinn's specialty.

http://www.pro-football-reference.co...nBr00/gamelog/

A few games he's had:

36 attempts, 185 yards
18 attempts, 94 yards
31 attempts, 99 yards
31 attempts, 100 yards
19 attempts, 90 yards
17 attempts, 66 yards

11 of his 14 appearances he's been under 6 yards per attempt.

That makes Cassel look like a goddamn HOFer.

I have no qualms about calling Brady Quinn one of the worst quarterbacks in this league.

[BigMeatballDave]

Originally Posted by Satanic Goat

That's Brady Quinn's specialty.

http://www.pro-football-reference.co...nBr00/gamelog/

A few games he's had:

36 attempts, 185 yards
18 attempts, 94 yards
31 attempts, 99 yards
31 attempts, 100 yards
19 attempts, 90 yards
17 attempts, 66 yards

11 of his 14 appearances he's been under 6 yards per attempt.

That makes Cassel look like a goddamn HOFer.

I have no qualms about calling Brady Quinn one of the worst quarterbacks in this league.

That may be, but I'd like to see him with real talent.

[BoneKrusher]

Originally Posted by Satanic Goat

That's Brady Quinn's specialty.

http://www.pro-football-reference.co...nBr00/gamelog/

A few games he's had:

36 attempts, 185 yards
18 attempts, 94 yards
31 attempts, 99 yards
31 attempts, 100 yards
19 attempts, 90 yards
17 attempts, 66 yards

11 of his 14 appearances he's been under 6 yards per attempt.

That makes Cassel look like a goddamn HOFer.

I have no qualms about calling Brady Quinn one of the worst quarterbacks in this league.

just curious, who were the starters at RB and WR in Cleveland?

and also thats one tough division he played in.

[Coogs]

Originally Posted by BoneKrusher

just curious, who were the starters at RB and WR in Cleveland?

and also thats one tough division he played in.

When he finally got to play... 3rd year... they got rid of Edwards, Winslow, and it seems like another receiver as well when the new coaching staff came in after Crennel.

[Hammock Parties]

Originally Posted by BoneKrusher

just curious, who were the starters at RB and WR in Cleveland?

and also thats one tough division he played in.

Who gives a shit?

[BoneKrusher]

Originally Posted by Satanic Goat

Who gives a shit?

i do, you're saying Quinn had his chance.

[aturnis]

Originally Posted by BoneKrusher

i jumped on the Quinn Bandwagon because i do NOT wanna sit through another season of three yard passes and game stats like: 15/20 for 90 yards and 3 ints.

i'll say this, "Anyone But Cassel" for the season ahead.

Again, that was more of a product of Haley and Muir's telephone-tag playcalling. Cassel rarely ever got more than a 2-3 second look at the defense when he went to the line. Definitely not enough time to read the defense, find favorable match-ups, call audibles and line adjustments.

The offense just "magically" got better when Orton took over? No, the game of telephone was over, and Crennel let Muir do his job without being micro-managed. The result, Orton looked good b/c the offense looked good. The offense looked good b/c Orton got a chance to read the D.

I do not like Cassel, but he will be closer to the 2010 Cassel than the 2011 version. Thing is, that still isn't enough for a Superbowl, so I'm ready to move on...

[The Franchise]

Originally Posted by aturnis

Again, that was more of a product of Haley and Muir's telephone-tag playcalling. Cassel rarely ever got more than a 2-3 second look at the defense when he went to the line. Definitely not enough time to read the defense, find favorable match-ups, call audibles and line adjustments.

The offense just "magically" got better when Orton took over? No, the game of telephone was over, and Crennel let Muir do his job without being micro-managed. The result, Orton looked good b/c the offense looked good. The offense looked good b/c Orton got a chance to read the D.

I do not like Cassel, but he will be closer to the 2010 Cassel than the 2011 version. Thing is, that still isn't enough for a Superbowl, so I'm ready to move on...