MU ****The official NEW new conference realignment thread.**** - Page 184

**Saul Good** · 01-31-2012, 02:52 PM

the second thread has been pronounced dead.

duncan_idaho · 05-27-2012, 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kchero

This will be Mizzou's 3rd Big 12 title game in the past 4 years for baseball...definitely a progressing program. We will have to step it up in the SEC though, completely different ballgame for that conference.

I don't follow baseball that closely, but the program IS clearly regressing. Since Crow left, they have fallen off from being a team that was making the NCAA tournament every year and challenging for a Big 12 title and in the running to win a regional to a team that's only shot to make the NCAAs is through winning the Big 12 tourney.

The first major "upgrade" they should do as members of the SEC is bring Brad Hill back to Missouri. Use some of that SEC money to lure Hill away from Kansas State....

Pasta Little Brioni · 05-27-2012, 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Braincase

At the end of the day, we're all just a bunch of fans. Students, husbands, dads, alumni, natives, whatever. Not a single one of us contributed a thing on the field today.

Hope you have a great weekend. I'm off to a dinner party, then heading out to see some family tomorrow and Monday.

Hope nobody gets hurt. Drive safe. Wear protection (sunscreen) . Don't screw crazy women.

Very, very wise words.

Braincase · 05-27-2012, 10:53 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good

Okay, 2-1 then.

I'm fine with that. What's it look like over the last 10 years or so?

Now I'm curious, and this is based on an assumption that men's football and basketball are on equal footing, which some would certainly debate.

School Year Football Winner Basketball Result Simple Record
02-03 Mizzou 36-12 Kansas 2, Mizzou 1 TIE (?)
03-04 Kansas 35-14 Kansas 3, Mizzou 0 Kansas 4-0
04-05 Kansas 31-14 Kansas 1, Mizzou 1 Kansas 2-1
05-06 Kansas 13-3 Kansas 1, Mizzou 1 Kansas 2-1
06-07 Mizzou 42-17 Kansas 2, Mizzou 0 Kansas 2-1
07-08 Mizzou 38-28 Kansas 2, Mizzou 0 Kansas 2-1
08-09 Kansas 40-37 Kansas 1, Mizzou 1 Kansas 2-1
09-10 Mizzou 31-39 Kansas 2, Mizzou 0 Kansas 2-1
10-11 Mizzou 35-7 Kansas 2, Mizzou 0 Kansas 2-1
11-12 Mizzou 24-10 Kansas 1, Mizzou 1 Mizzou 2-1

It's readily apparent that Mizzou has absolutely dominated Kansas in the non-revenue sports over the course of the last 10 years, but in the revenue sports, the last 10 years have been fairly close.

The rivalry will be missed. Wish you all had chosen to stick with the Big 12.

**Saul Good** · 05-27-2012, 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Braincase

I'm fine with that. What's it look like over the last 10 years or so?

Weird that KU fans are trying to cherry pick specific sports and dates to make it look like their athletic department is on par with Mizzou.

"If you eliminate 90% of the sports and then take years "X" through "Y", then what would the data look like?" /KU Fan

Braincase · 05-27-2012, 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good

Weird that KU fans are trying to cherry pick specific sports and dates to make it look like their athletic department is on par with Mizzou.

"If you eliminate 90% of the sports and then take years "X" through "Y", then what would the data look like?" /KU Fan

I was merely curious after your "OK, 2-1 then" post. I used the criteria that you more or less agreed to, and went back 10 years. Feel free to go back 20 if you like.

I'll more than concede Missouri's success in non-revenue sports.

**Saul Good** · 05-27-2012, 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Braincase

I was merely curious after your "OK, 2-1 then" post. I used the criteria that you more or less agreed to, and went back 10 years. Feel free to go back 20 if you like.

I'll more than concede Missouri's success in non-revenue sports.

Mizzou dominates Kansas in everything but track and basketball.

Pablo · 05-27-2012, 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good

Weird that KU fans are trying to cherry pick specific sports and dates to make it look like their athletic department is on par with Mizzou.

"If you eliminate 90% of the sports and then take years "X" through "Y", then what would the data look like?" /KU Fan

Yeah, because going back a decade in the two biggest sports is really cherry picking.

**Saulbadguy** · 05-27-2012, 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good

Mizzou dominates Kansas in everything but track and basketball.

Yea, huge accomplishment.

**Saul Good** · 05-27-2012, 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PostRockPablo

Yeah, because going back a decade in the two biggest sports is really cherry picking.

Let me know when there is an official competition between the schools for just those two.

Braincase · 05-27-2012, 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good

Mizzou dominates Kansas in everything but track and basketball.

Define "dominate". 55% wins? 60% wins?

How about 47.5%? I think you would agree that if a team won 47.5% of their games against an opponent, then they would be considered dominant.

Braincase · 05-27-2012, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good

Mizzou dominates Kansas in everything but track and basketball.

Please provide links with records and percentages.

Pablo · 05-27-2012, 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good

Let me know when there is an official competition between the schools for just those two.

Pretend you care about anything but those two sports. That wrestling title get your cock hard?

Messier · 05-27-2012, 11:50 AM

I don't know. I suppose you can brag about dominating in volleyball, tennis, even college baseball, and the like. If I followed, and cared about those sports I guess it'd stick in my craw a bit.

KU is a storied, and top five all time program in what almost everyone would consider is one of the top two sports in college athletics. MU is not in either sport. If I were an MU fan that would bother me a little, but what can you do?

**Reaper16** · 05-27-2012, 11:57 AM

Saul Good is not doing so hot today.

Braincase · 05-27-2012, 12:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Reaper16

Saul Good is not doing so hot today.

Give him a chance to back up his story. I'm more than willing to concede my position. Of late, Mizzou has done very well in non-revenue sports. I merely ask for a few links where he supports his argument.

I've conceded baseball, and he's conceded basketball and track. That leaves the following:

Volleyball
Soccer
Men's and Women's Cross Country
Women's Swimming & Diving
Women's Basketball
Softball
Men's and Women's Golf

I look forward to the results.

01-31-2012, 02:52 PM
Saul Good Quit your bullshit Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: Bored of winning Casino cash: $10052799	**The official NEW new conference realignment thread.** the second thread has been pronounced dead.
Posts: 41,870

05-27-2012, 11:50 AM	#2758
Messier MVP Join Date: Mar 2004 Casino cash: $10005050	I don't know. I suppose you can brag about dominating in volleyball, tennis, even college baseball, and the like. If I followed, and cared about those sports I guess it'd stick in my craw a bit. KU is a storied, and top five all time program in what almost everyone would consider is one of the top two sports in college athletics. MU is not in either sport. If I were an MU fan that would bother me a little, but what can you do?
Posts: 7,610