|
|
08-14-2012, 01:08 PM | #1 |
Ain't no relax!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Casino cash: $1918919
|
Look:
Now you tell me...... can you see the discrepancy? A lot of what you think is happening on that micro USB cable is actually done by the board of the device, and not the port. For what Apple is doing, there's no way in hell to make it work using micro USB.
__________________
|
Posts: 47,693
|
08-14-2012, 07:44 PM | #2 |
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Austin
Casino cash: $2319112
|
You ready for a tech beat down? I'll give you a chance to back off this line of thinking before I put the hammer down....
|
Posts: 19,590
|
08-14-2012, 07:59 PM | #3 | ||
Ain't no relax!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Casino cash: $1918919
|
Quote:
The design of the 30 pin connecter is about efficiency. Quote:
If you're an accessory creator, the following makes it incredibly efficient to create devices and support that have direct access to only the data you care about, and zero overhead of data that is irrelevant to its function. In no way can you understate the importance of that. And the future version will be just as future-proof, because the concept is so solid.
__________________
|
||
Posts: 47,693
|
08-14-2012, 08:21 PM | #4 | |
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Austin
Casino cash: $2319112
|
Quote:
The cost (in dollars and power) of USB controller chips is negligible. You don't need a "power hungry CPU." That is just ridiculous. If you want to argue that "back in the day" it was necessary... I will let that slide... but if you argue that it is necessary NOW.. you are dead wrong(from a technical standpoint). |
|
Posts: 19,590
|
08-14-2012, 08:37 PM | #5 | |
Ain't no relax!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Casino cash: $1918919
|
Quote:
USB controller chips are irrelevant. Because they transfer bulk data through one pipe(Data+), and leave it up to the CPU of the receiving device to decode everything and extract only the relevant information pertaining to its function. Splitting the data into only the applicable pieces you need has been the standard for evolution of just about all forms of data transfer. All technology has developed more pipes and multiple processors to reduce overall load. Multi core processors are a perfect example. Divide and conquer algorithm. And one of the reasons that they're reducing the size is indeed because it's no longer necessary to port so many protocols independently. That's not a surprise. In regards to the 30 pin connector, firewire support is no longer necessary. That's how they easily cut down to 19 pins.
__________________
|
|
Posts: 47,693
|
08-14-2012, 10:12 PM | #6 | |
Administrator
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Austin
Casino cash: $2319112
|
Quote:
should never have been replaced! btw.. no one is talking about USB as the actual BUS just using the USB connector (like MHL does) so your argument which was ridiculously wrong technically also fails on the fact that it simply doesn't apply. Oh and your USB info is woefully out of date.. the CURRENT standard is the 11-pin USB 3 micro.. as used by the Samsung Galaxy sIII and any newer phones. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Fi...cro_B_plug.svg |
|
Posts: 19,590
|
08-14-2012, 10:24 PM | #7 | |
Ain't no relax!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Casino cash: $1918919
|
Quote:
USB3 micro is only 11 pins. That won't work.
__________________
|
|
Posts: 47,693
|
08-14-2012, 11:32 PM | #8 | |
Ain't no relax!
Join Date: Sep 2005
Casino cash: $1918919
|
Quote:
Hammer deflected. +15
__________________
|
|
Posts: 47,693
|
|
|