Life Teacher on Trial for Having Sex with Students: Orgies Videotaped - Page 5

Amnorix · 08-16-2012, 06:59 AM

Sorry, but no link to any videotape here.

Apparently this 27 year old teacher had sex with at least five of her high school students, including multiple orgies. The students were all of legal age at the time, however.

Quote:

Aaron said in court he had sex with Colleps five times in spring 2011 – four of those instances included other male students. While all were reportedly 18 or older at the time, it’s illegal in Texas for a teacher to engage in sex acts with a student.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nati...#ixzz23iIFC6mh

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/nati...icle-1.1137146

Planetman · 08-16-2012, 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BIG_DADDY

If I said Larry was a bitch for letting Harry ejaculate in his ass you would call me a hateful bigot yet you feel justified doing it here.

It's high schools mentality parallels like this that cause me to give 99% of your replies zero attention.

mikey23545 · 08-16-2012, 09:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Planetman

If you were single and hooked up with your female boss at work, should she stand trial?

Are you actually stupid enough to compare students with employees, or the workplace with a high school?

Maybe you should have spent more time in school trying to learn something, and less time ****ing your teachers.

Reerun_KC · 08-16-2012, 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikey23545

Are you actually stupid enough to compare students with employees, or the workplace with a high school?

Maybe you should have spent more time in school trying to learn something, and less time ****ing your teachers.

Hey no need to hate...

Planetman · 08-16-2012, 09:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikey23545

Are you actually stupid enough to compare students with employees, or the workplace with a high school?

Maybe you should have spent more time in school trying to learn something, and less time ****ing your teachers.

Hey, Sandy Vagina, you said "people in authority." Don't get your panties in a twist because I called you out on it.

**Saul Good** · 08-16-2012, 09:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikey23545

Are you actually stupid enough to compare students with employees, or the workplace with a high school?

Maybe you should have spent more time in school trying to learn something, and less time ****ing your teachers.

A boss holds a lot more power over an employee than a teacher does over an 18 year old high school student.

mikey23545 · 08-16-2012, 09:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good

A boss holds a lot more power over an employee than a teacher does over an 18 year old high school student.

Completely untrue.

A young person has a lot more chance of being influenced by an authority figure than an employee in a workplace.

mikey23545 · 08-16-2012, 09:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Planetman

Hey, Sandy Vagina, you said "people in authority." Don't get your panties in a twist because I called you out on it.

You're just pissed because I blew your argument out of the water, dipshit.

Amnorix · 08-16-2012, 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikey23545

How many of you numb-nutted perverts cannot understand how it is more than just inappropriate for a person in an authority position to have sex with their charges, especially in a teacher-student relationship?

The issue is that the students here are of consenting age. We're not talking about kids. We're talking about LEGAL ADULTS.

So the question is, should we treat teacher-student sex all that differently from, say, employer/employee sex, or psychatrist/patient, doctor/client, etc.

Clearly in each case such conduct should be a fireable offense, and/or loss of licensure. I could even see it being a relatively minor crime for teacher-student, but 20 years is beyond bananas. This isn't pedophia. It's 18 year old boys -- old enough to vote, drive, join the Marines, etc.

Chief Gump · 08-16-2012, 09:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikey23545

Completely untrue.

A young person has a lot more chance of being influenced by an authority figure than an employee in a workplace.

So people who are bad influences for people that are 18 should be jailed?

Chief Gump · 08-16-2012, 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amnorix

The issue is that the students here are of consenting age. We're not talking about kids. We're talking about LEGAL ADULTS.

So the question is, should we treat teacher-student sex all that differently from, say, employer/employee sex, or psychatrist/patient, doctor/client, etc.

Clearly in each case such conduct should be a fireable offense, and/or loss of licensure. I could even see it being a relatively minor crime for teacher-student, but 20 years is beyond bananas. This isn't pedophia. It's 18 year old boys -- old enough to vote, drive, join the Marines, etc.

Exactly

JD10367 · 08-16-2012, 09:48 AM

For crissakes, it's not "a young person". This isn't a camp counselor diddling a 10-year-old, or an old crony boss telling his young secretary to get on her knees if she wants to keep her job. It's a horny 28-year-old banging some horny 18-year-olds. As Saul stated, it's inappropriate and fireable, but let's not start selling colored ribbons for people to wear in support and memory of "the 18-year-olds who had sex with their teacher". They weren't "influenced by authority", they were influenced by raging hormones and a half-decent twentysomething who offered to let them fill every hole like they were spackling a wall for papering. Nothing to see here, move along.

**The Franchise** · 08-16-2012, 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikey23545

Completely untrue.

A young person has a lot more chance of being influenced by an authority figure than an employee in a workplace.

Uhh....what? If you're talking about a 14-15 year old kid....sure. 18 year old? Not so much.

Amnorix · 08-16-2012, 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikey23545

Completely untrue.

A young person has a lot more chance of being influenced by an authority figure than an employee in a workplace.

So 27 year old teacher boinks 18 year old student once (in theory, that's not what happened HERE, I know, but that's what the law is) and could get 20 years of prison time and that sounds about right to you?

Sorry, but that's ****ed up.

Chief Gump · 08-16-2012, 09:57 AM

18 yo + 28 yo = OK

18 yo student + 28 yo teacher = 20 years

Show me what ill effects that are different between these two equations and point to the ones that should take away 20 years of the 28 yo teachers life.

Brock · 08-16-2012, 09:59 AM

She should be fired and shouldn't be a teacher anymore. Prison, or even a criminal record? No.

08-16-2012, 09:48 AM	#71
JD10367 Cheaterlover* Join Date: May 2009 Location: RI Casino cash: $10010716	For crissakes, it's not "a young person". This isn't a camp counselor diddling a 10-year-old, or an old crony boss telling his young secretary to get on her knees if she wants to keep her job. It's a horny 28-year-old banging some horny 18-year-olds. As Saul stated, it's inappropriate and fireable, but let's not start selling colored ribbons for people to wear in support and memory of "the 18-year-olds who had sex with their teacher". They weren't "influenced by authority", they were influenced by raging hormones and a half-decent twentysomething who offered to let them fill every hole like they were spackling a wall for papering. Nothing to see here, move along.
Posts: 12,916

08-16-2012, 09:57 AM	#74
Chief Gump Run dumb ass run Join Date: Jun 2012 Casino cash: $10004900	18 yo + 28 yo = OK 18 yo student + 28 yo teacher = 20 years Show me what ill effects that are different between these two equations and point to the ones that should take away 20 years of the 28 yo teachers life.
Posts: 437

08-16-2012, 09:59 AM	#75
Brock Say hello to my little friend Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Larryville Casino cash: $9598422	She should be fired and shouldn't be a teacher anymore. Prison, or even a criminal record? No.
Posts: 47,314