Chiefs Eric Winston is Full of Shit

**the Talking Can** · 10-08-2012, 01:36 PM

so in romeo's presser he said, when asked why they ran so much, "would you rather lose 40-10?"

he basically said we had no chance of winning if we relied on our QB

Chiefs Pantalones · 10-08-2012, 01:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can

so in romeo's presser he said, when asked why they ran so much, "would you rather lose 40-10?"

he basically said we had no chance of winning if we relied on our QB

Someone should ask him why we don't make the f'ing change then? Maybe Pioli has Crennel's hands tied or something? It makes no sense. Any other team would've benched him by now.

Tophawk36 · 10-08-2012, 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can

so in romeo's presser he said, when asked why they ran so much, "would you rather lose 40-10?"

he basically said we had no chance of winning if we relied on our QB

That made me laugh. JFC Romeo is a disaster. He is pimping how great it was to lose by 3. Would I rather lose 40-10? No I would rather win you idiot.

**the Talking Can** · 10-08-2012, 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tophawk36

That made me laugh. JFC Romeo is a disaster. He is pimping how great it was to lose by 3. Would I rather lose 40-10? No I would rather win you idiot.

he seems very proud of not getting blown out...

sad or hilarious?

jd1020 · 10-08-2012, 01:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can

he seems very proud of not getting blown out...

sad or hilarious?

Both.

Tophawk36 · 10-08-2012, 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can

he seems very proud of not getting blown out...

sad or hilarious?

It's both. It's almost seems like he wants people to congratulate him for not getting blown out. It's a really odd how Crennel rationalizes his really terrible coaching job.

**DeezNutz** · 10-08-2012, 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can

so in romeo's presser he said, when asked why they ran so much, "would you rather lose 40-10?"

he basically said we had no chance of winning if we relied on our QB

Not one question about Cassel's terrible play. Not one question about why he didn't consider replacing him before the injury. Not one question about whether or not he has the authority to pull Pioli's bastard.

Chiefs Pantalones · 10-08-2012, 01:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

Not one question about Cassel's terrible play. Not one question about why he didn't consider replacing him before the injury. Not one question about whether or not he has the authority to pull Pioli's bastard.

The media in KC used to have balls and his name was Whitlock.

Marty Mac Ver 2.0 · 10-08-2012, 01:49 PM

FTW

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones

The media in KC used to have balls and his name was Whitlock.

**the Talking Can** · 10-08-2012, 01:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz

Not one question about Cassel's terrible play. Not one question about why he didn't consider replacing him before the injury. Not one question about whether or not he has the authority to pull Pioli's bastard.

how ****ing hard is it to ask a simple question about the QB???

"Matt Cassel had a 38 QB rating yesterday, and is the lowest rated QB in the league, how long will that be acceptable?"

**ChiTown** · 10-08-2012, 01:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can

so in romeo's presser he said, when asked why they ran so much, "would you rather lose 40-10?"

he basically said we had no chance of winning if we relied on our QB

I turned it off after that. That told me all I need to know about how ****ed up this Franchise really is.

Chiefs Pantalones · 10-08-2012, 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by the Talking Can

so in romeo's presser he said, when asked why they ran so much, "would you rather lose 40-10?"

he basically said we had no chance of winning if we relied on our QB

This pretty much proves to me, just my opinion, that Crennel has his hands tied. I'm not taking up for Crennel, but this is proof that Cassel's status is Pioli's decision.

Imon Yourside · 10-08-2012, 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones

This pretty much proves to me, just my opinion, that Crennel has his hands tied. I'm not taking up for Crennel, but this is proof that Cassel's status is Pioli's decision.

The same way Haley and Weis reacted.

htismaqe · 10-08-2012, 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefs Pantalones

This pretty much proves to me, just my opinion, that Crennel has his hands tied. I'm not taking up for Crennel, but this is proof that Cassel's status is Pioli's decision.

Crennel asked to have his hands tied. He willingly accepted the job, knowing what it entailed.

Chiefs Pantalones · 10-08-2012, 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe

Crennel asked to have his hands tied. He willingly accepted the job, knowing what it entailed.

For that he is a coward piece of shit, just like Pioli.

10-08-2012, 01:36 PM	#1
the Talking Can Supporter Join Date: Aug 2001 Location: street Casino cash: $10022208	so in romeo's presser he said, when asked why they ran so much, "would you rather lose 40-10?" he basically said we had no chance of winning if we relied on our QB __________________ Clark Hunt: "Thank god for the Dominican pool boy"
Posts: 51,585