|
|
![]() |
#1 |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2000
Casino cash: $10005036
|
I'm good with it.
My 1st choice is Geno but if we can't get him, I'd take Wilson over Barkley. I think his skills are better. |
Posts: 5,747
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
Quote:
The only "sure thing" so far is Geno, although the Combine always reveals more candidates. |
|
Posts: 88,960
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2000
Casino cash: $10005036
|
Yeah he's had a shakey season that's for sure. Don't know if it's all that's gone on at Arkansas this year or what. Still, think I'd still roll the dice on him over Barkley.
|
Posts: 5,747
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Supporter
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Hollywood, CA
Casino cash: $10053648
|
It's too early to make that type of decision. Plus, Barkley has shown maturity by staying his senior season when he would have been a Top Ten pick whereas there are serious questions about Wilson's maturity level.
|
Posts: 88,960
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2000
Casino cash: $10005036
|
Yeah I'm not firm on that decision yet. While I don't like Barkley's arm strength, I'll admit it's relatively overrated. I do like his experience.
|
Posts: 5,747
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Admitted Planet Junky
Join Date: Oct 2000
Casino cash: $-1628373
|
Based on this season...Arkansas has a new head coach that sucks ass. Under Petrino who runs a pro style of offense Wilson looked really good. At least Wilson called his teammates out for not trying hard and giving the same effort that they have in the past. He seems like a leader.
__________________
Fanaticism is nowhere. There is no tenderness or humanity in fanaticism. |
Posts: 19,567
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2000
Casino cash: $10005036
|
Quote:
He was looking to be right up there with Barkley. Now after a disasterous season with turnover you tellin me the guy has simply lost it? The way things seem to be going, Geno will go 1 with Barkley going somewhere around there also. If this guy is our consolation prize, we could do worse. ![]() But have to see more. I'll admit I've been recording a lot of WV's games on TV this year... Have to see if I can check out more of Arkansas. |
|
Posts: 5,747
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Sauntering Vaguely Downwards
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Columbia, Mo
Casino cash: $-870901
|
Quote:
A) Petrino runs a 'pro-style offense' in the same way Dana Holgorsen does. Petrino ran a pure spread offense with deep crossing routes designed to allow Wilson to throw it up to his skill players. Wilson's reads were limited at best and he was rarely asked to go through progressions. No, Petrino did not run a conventional offense and in fact John L. Smith runs a far more conventional O than Petrion did. B) Wilson called out his teammates in a game he didn't play. He seems like a shithead that would say "I can't throw the ball and catch it". If you don't think your teammates are trying hard, you tape up your ouchies instead of ducking Alabama and you get in their faces in the locker room. You don't, however, skip the game and then publicly throw them under the bus. What he's done is the exact opposite of what a leader should do. If Bray or Cutler did it, we'd call them turbo-douches for it. In closing: Everything you said in this post is wrong. But you're welcome to continue seeing what you want to see in Tyler Wilson.
__________________
"If there's a god, he's laughing at us.....and our football team..." "When you look at something through rose colored glasses, all the red flags just look like flags." |
|
Posts: 66,868
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|