Chiefs just more speculation about RGIII - Page 20

tooge · 02-28-2012, 04:33 PM

Well, at least they mention the chiefs

Robert Griffin trade rumors already spinning out of control
Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on February 28, 2012, 4:04 PM EST

APForget the Combine. Forget free agency. Robert Griffin III trade chatter dominates the NFL discussion these days.

And it’s still February.

Perhaps Rams COO Kevin Demoff is right: It’s getting less crazy to imagine a deal could be completed before free agency. We’ve read and heard an unprecedented amount of trade rumors about the No. 2 overall pick for this time of year.

Let’s go over the latest:

1. Mike Jones of the Washington Post writes the Redskins would give up the No. 6 overall pick and next year’s first round pick in addition to multiple picks in the mid-to-upper rounds of the draft. Consider this the starting point for negotiations.

The Rams are reportedly looking for a similar package to the one San Diego netted for Eli Manning: Two firsts (including the No. 4 overall pick), a third- and fifth-round pick. The Redskins sound ready to meet this demand.

2. Texas A&M prospect Ryan Tannehill is watching the Griffin talk closely. Jones believes the Redskins would take Tannehill at No. 6 overal if they can’t get Griffin.

3. Terry Pluto of the Cleveland Plain-Dealer believes the Browns will ultimately have to give up three first-round picks in order to land Griffin. Do I hear four, Redskins? (This reminds us of a classic article by the Onion.)

4. Demoff told Peter King of SI.com that the Rams received a feeler from a team “you would never expect.” Does Kansas City count? If not, we’ll roll with Philadelphia as our irresponsible guess for a mystery team. Enter your pick below.

5. The St. Louis Post-Dispatch considers the Redskins the early favorite to land Griffin. This sounds true based on all the reports, plus Mike Shanahan’s close relationship with Jeff Fisher.

tredadda · 02-29-2012, 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501

That's not too expensive. That's actually a really good scenario, Laz.

My goodness, is the world about to end? A scenario to get RGIII that you support.

chiefzilla1501 · 02-29-2012, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda

My goodness, is the world about to end? A scenario to get RGIII that you support.

If you read the thread, I want to trade up to get RGIII. I am supportive of any trade up that doesn't force us to abandon a bunch of our picks. I really like Laz's offer because the extra first round pick we'd be giving up is one we only get because we traded away a player we were planning to lose anyway.

dlphg9 · 02-29-2012, 04:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by eric007

excuse me they are in the SEC

Man you have me

. Are people honestly this clueless? You sound like a Raider fan.

kcxiv · 10-23-2012, 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRR

So drafting a QB between 11-20 is a risk but trading your entire draft+ for RG3 isn't?
Posted via Mobile Device

lol, Apparently not!

Dr. Johnny Fever · 10-23-2012, 04:17 PM

Did we get RG3 yet?

**DaneMcCloud** · 10-23-2012, 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRR

That's not what I'm saying and you know it. What I'm saying is that you don't give up an entire draft and then some for one player. That idea is simply idiotic. It has nothing to do with drafting scared...it's all about not over-reacting to the hype and having the brain to realize football is 11 on 11.
Posted via Mobile Device

RGIII or:

Poe
Allen
Stephenson
Wylie
Menzie
Gray
Long

Yeah, that would have been an awful trade.

The 2012 draft class was far too important to the franchise than to trade it away for Griffin.

Titty Meat · 10-23-2012, 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

RGIII or:

Poe
Allen
Stephenson
Wylie
Menzie
Gray
Long

Yeah, that would have been an awful trade.

The 2012 draft class was far too important to the franchise than to trade it away for Griffin.

Good thing Clark is going to give Pioli a 5th chance

**DaneMcCloud** · 10-23-2012, 04:31 PM

Good to see that Chiefzilla was on the wrong side of the argument.

What else is new?

**SAUTO** · 10-23-2012, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

RGIII or:

Poe
Allen
Stephenson
Wylie
Menzie
Gray
Long

Yeah, that would have been an awful trade.

The 2012 draft class was far too important to the franchise than to trade it away for Griffin.

If we ended up at eleven this year I'm on record saying we should sign Bowe and Albert and trade the next two drafts for Smith
Posted via Mobile Device

mcaj22 · 10-23-2012, 04:35 PM

good thing we have no chance at signing Bowe or Albert and will have to play unproven turds like Baldwin and Stephenson to surround our 1st round rookie QB

thanks Scott you fat idiot

**DaneMcCloud** · 10-23-2012, 04:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO

If we ended up at eleven this year I'm on record saying we should sign Bowe and Albert and trade the next two drafts for Smith
Posted via Mobile Device

Fortunately, there's no way that happens.

The Chiefs will pick top three, although I think number one overall until proven otherwise.

Nightfyre · 10-23-2012, 04:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud

RGIII or:

Poe
Allen
Stephenson
Wylie
Menzie
Gray
Long

Yeah, that would have been an awful trade.

The 2012 draft class was far too important to the franchise than to trade it away for Griffin.

You guys are reeruned. The Redskins gave up two firsts and a second to swap up from the sixth pick. It would have taken at least an extra first for us to move up from #11, if not more simply because it would have been so far out. that is worth a shitton more than our entire 2012 and 2013 draft picks put together.

**SAUTO** · 10-23-2012, 04:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22

good thing we have no chance at signing Bowe or Albert and will have to play unproven turds like Baldwin and Stephenson to surround our 1st round rookie QB

thanks Scott you fat idiot

Link?
Posted via Mobile Device

listopencil · 10-23-2012, 05:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Nightfyre

You guys are reeruned. The Redskins gave up two firsts and a second to swap up from the sixth pick. It would have taken at least an extra first for us to move up from #11, if not more simply because it would have been so far out. that is worth a shitton more than our entire 2012 and 2013 draft picks put together.

At this point, RGIII is showing that he would have been worth whatever you had to trade for him. That kid is incredible.

kcxiv · 10-23-2012, 05:02 PM

Albert i think we can sign, Bowe, he's gone.

02-28-2012, 04:33 PM
tooge MVP Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Liberty, MO Casino cash: $674112	just more speculation about RGIII Well, at least they mention the chiefs Robert Griffin trade rumors already spinning out of control Posted by Gregg Rosenthal on February 28, 2012, 4:04 PM EST APForget the Combine. Forget free agency. Robert Griffin III trade chatter dominates the NFL discussion these days. And it’s still February. Perhaps Rams COO Kevin Demoff is right: It’s getting less crazy to imagine a deal could be completed before free agency. We’ve read and heard an unprecedented amount of trade rumors about the No. 2 overall pick for this time of year. Let’s go over the latest: 1. Mike Jones of the Washington Post writes the Redskins would give up the No. 6 overall pick and next year’s first round pick in addition to multiple picks in the mid-to-upper rounds of the draft. Consider this the starting point for negotiations. The Rams are reportedly looking for a similar package to the one San Diego netted for Eli Manning: Two firsts (including the No. 4 overall pick), a third- and fifth-round pick. The Redskins sound ready to meet this demand. 2. Texas A&M prospect Ryan Tannehill is watching the Griffin talk closely. Jones believes the Redskins would take Tannehill at No. 6 overal if they can’t get Griffin. 3. Terry Pluto of the Cleveland Plain-Dealer believes the Browns will ultimately have to give up three first-round picks in order to land Griffin. Do I hear four, Redskins? (This reminds us of a classic article by the Onion.) 4. Demoff told Peter King of SI.com that the Rams received a feeler from a team “you would never expect.” Does Kansas City count? If not, we’ll roll with Philadelphia as our irresponsible guess for a mystery team. Enter your pick below. 5. The St. Louis Post-Dispatch considers the Redskins the early favorite to land Griffin. This sounds true based on all the reports, plus Mike Shanahan’s close relationship with Jeff Fisher.
Posts: 17,170

10-23-2012, 04:17 PM	#290
Dr. Johnny Fever stax of wax Join Date: Feb 2004 Casino cash: $10004900	Did we get RG3 yet? __________________ courtesy of BoneKrusher "Baseball? It's just a game. As simple as a ball and bat, yet as complex as the American spirit it symbolizes. It's a sport, a business and sometimes a religion." Ernie Harwell
Posts: 34,865

10-23-2012, 04:31 PM	#293
DaneMcCloud Supporter Join Date: Sep 2000 Location: Hollywood, CA Casino cash: $10053648	Good to see that Chiefzilla was on the wrong side of the argument. What else is new?
Posts: 88,960

10-23-2012, 04:35 PM	#295
mcaj22 MVP Join Date: Feb 2010 Casino cash: $10014454	good thing we have no chance at signing Bowe or Albert and will have to play unproven turds like Baldwin and Stephenson to surround our 1st round rookie QB thanks Scott you fat idiot
Posts: 11,886

10-23-2012, 05:02 PM	#300
kcxiv In Search of a Life Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Central Valley, Cali Casino cash: $8697996	Albert i think we can sign, Bowe, he's gone.
Posts: 29,111