NFL Draft Peter King: Scouts not impressed with 2013 QB class

Woodchuck · 11-05-2012, 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR

Woodchuck, it sounds like you're pretty confident all these QBs will bust this year.

You've posted this kind of garbage before. I wish you'd just come out and say it.

You think it's too risky this year to draft a QB with the top pick. You want one of those LBers or DEs. Don't you?

I have said it recently. Maybe last week? If we are picking in the top 10, I'm not picking a QB. I would try and take Jones, Milner, or Mingo. Then, I would find a way back into the first round to draft a QB. The difference between Barkley, Wilson, Smith, and Glennon isn't that much. In my opinion, all of these guys should be going after #20. However, the reality is that QBs generally go about ten picks higher than they should. Maybe one or two even jump into the top 10 because of the cheaper contracts?

If we get Jones for example, we can deal Hali. I love Hali but it's time to quit thinking with out hearts. Also, we can use our third to move up because we will get another one for Carr.

There is not a clear cut QB to take #1 overall. That says alot. I am 100% all in for taking a first round QB. We just don't have to be stupid about it.

Last, I don't know if these guys will bust. I just said it's a sucky year to be taking a QB early in the draft.

**New World Order** · 11-05-2012, 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Woodsponge Chuckpants

I have said it recently. Maybe last week? If we are picking in the top 10, I'm not picking a QB. I would try and take Jones, Milner, or Mingo. Then, I would find a way back into the first round to draft a QB. The difference between Barkley, Wilson, Smith, and Glennon isn't that much. In my opinion, all of these guys should be going after #20. However, the reality is that QBs generally go about ten picks higher than they should. Maybe one or two even jump into the top 10 because of the cheaper contracts?

If we get Jones for example, we can deal Hali. I love Hali but it's time to quit thinking with out hearts. Also, we can use our third to move up because we will get another one for Carr.

There is not a clear cut QB to take #1 overall. That says alot. I am 100% all in for taking a first round QB. We just don't have to be stupid about it.

Last, I don't know if these guys will bust. I just said it's a sucky year to be taking a QB early in the draft.

Another DE from LSU?

**RealSNR** · 11-05-2012, 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Woodsponge Chuckpants

I have said it recently. Maybe last week? If we are picking in the top 10, I'm not picking a QB. I would try and take Jones, Milner, or Mingo. Then, I would find a way back into the first round to draft a QB. The difference between Barkley, Wilson, Smith, and Glennon isn't that much. In my opinion, all of these guys should be going after #20. However, the reality is that QBs generally go about ten picks higher than they should. Maybe one or two even jump into the top 10 because of the cheaper contracts?

If we get Jones for example, we can deal Hali. I love Hali but it's time to quit thinking with out hearts. Also, we can use our third to move up because we will get another one for Carr.

There is not a clear cut QB to take #1 overall. That says alot. I am 100% all in for taking a first round QB. We just don't have to be stupid about it.

Last, I don't know if these guys will bust. I just said it's a sucky year to be taking a QB early in the draft.

I would have had you pegged for a Te'o guy.

Either way, you're a ****ing moron.

Woodchuck · 11-05-2012, 04:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR

I would have had you pegged for a Te'o guy.

Either way, you're a ****ing moron.

You do! I forgot about him! I like the leadership but it's hard to predict where first round MLBs will go. Guys like Laurinitus, Ryans, and Lewis all went later than expected. Even Willis didn't go top 10 and he was definately better than Te'o. However, the salaries have changed so maybe?

Buckweath · 11-05-2012, 04:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Woodsponge Chuckpants

I have said it recently. Maybe last week? If we are picking in the top 10, I'm not picking a QB. I would try and take Jones, Milner, or Mingo. Then, I would find a way back into the first round to draft a QB. The difference between Barkley, Wilson, Smith, and Glennon isn't that much. In my opinion, all of these guys should be going after #20. However, the reality is that QBs generally go about ten picks higher than they should. Maybe one or two even jump into the top 10 because of the cheaper contracts?

If we get Jones for example, we can deal Hali. I love Hali but it's time to quit thinking with out hearts. Also, we can use our third to move up because we will get another one for Carr.

There is not a clear cut QB to take #1 overall. That says alot. I am 100% all in for taking a first round QB. We just don't have to be stupid about it.

Last, I don't know if these guys will bust. I just said it's a sucky year to be taking a QB early in the draft.

Thank god you'Re not the Chiefs GM. This team needs to go and draft their favorite QB prospect as early as possible. I can't believe there are Chiefs fans who still have that mentality of oh that QB is not worth that early pick, let's trade back and pick up some QB that will fall.

Yes, this team has to be stupid and crazy about drafting a QB early, as simple as that!!!

Look at all the early picks that this team has drafted in the last few years... Dorsey, Jackson, Berry... look at how they are playing this year.

And you still want to draft some elite D prospect instead of a QB with our top 5 pick?? PLEASE

ChiefsCountry · 11-05-2012, 04:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Buckweath

Thank god you'Re not the Chiefs GM. This team needs to go and draft their favorite QB prospect as early as possible. I can't believe there are Chiefs fans who still have that mentality of oh that QB is not worth that early pick, let's trade back and pick up some QB that will fall.

Yes, this team has to be stupid and crazy about drafting a QB early, as simple as that!!!

Look at all the early picks that this team has drafted in the last few years... Dorsey, Jackson, Berry... look at how they are playing this year.

And you still want to draft some elite D prospect instead of a QB with our top 5 pick?? PLEASE

Some dumbass called into 810 and said the same thing as DoucheBob. Complete ****ing idiots.

Woodchuck · 11-05-2012, 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

Some dumbass called into 810 and said the same thing as DoucheBob. Complete ****ing idiots.

It wasn't me.

suds79 · 11-05-2012, 04:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry

Some dumbass called into 810 and said the same thing as DoucheBob. Complete ****ing idiots.

It really doesn't bother me. I call them the 5 percenters. It's that small percentage of people out there no matter how obvious or clear something might be they see it differently.

I'm sure there's even a few Matt Cassel supporters out there lurking around somewhere. You can't explain it.

You waste your time when you try to rationalize with these type of people. There's always going to be some idiots out there. Won't ever get 100% of the people thinking the same way.

Let them be.

FlaChief58 · 11-05-2012, 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Woodsponge Chuckpants

I have said it recently. Maybe last week? If we are picking in the top 10, I'm not picking a QB. I would try and take Jones, Milner, or Mingo. Then, I would find a way back into the first round to draft a QB. The difference between Barkley, Wilson, Smith, and Glennon isn't that much. In my opinion, all of these guys should be going after #20. However, the reality is that QBs generally go about ten picks higher than they should. Maybe one or two even jump into the top 10 because of the cheaper contracts?

If we get Jones for example, we can deal Hali. I love Hali but it's time to quit thinking with out hearts. Also, we can use our third to move up because we will get another one for Carr.

There is not a clear cut QB to take #1 overall. That says alot. I am 100% all in for taking a first round QB. We just don't have to be stupid about it.

Last, I don't know if these guys will bust. I just said it's a sucky year to be taking a QB early in the draft.

That's reeruned even by your standards. This teams biggest need is and has been QB. Hell, I say let's draft a QB in the first and third and pick up a vet in FA so we can have a REAL QB competition because what we have now is pure shit.

Woodchuck · 11-06-2012, 07:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Flachief58

That's reeruned even by your standards. This teams biggest need is and has been QB. Hell, I say let's draft a QB in the first and third and pick up a vet in FA so we can have a REAL QB competition because what we have now is pure shit.

I am definately for drafting two QBs. However, if you are picking and don't think there is much difference in potential between the top four QBs, why is it reeruned? Why not take the best player early and then move back into the first and take what you can get? One of them will be there.

Also, I never threatened to sue the planet. I have stated this multiple times. It is sad that several of the usual haters are resorting to lies because their asses hurt. I'm done explaining things. Believe what you want.

Sorter · 11-06-2012, 10:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Woodsponge Chuckpants

I am definately for drafting two QBs. However, if you are picking and don't think there is much difference in potential between the top four QBs, why is it reeruned? Why not take the best player early and then move back into the first and take what you can get? One of them will be there.

Also, I never threatened to sue the planet. I have stated this multiple times. It is sad that several of the usual haters are resorting to lies because their asses hurt. I'm done explaining things. Believe what you want.

Actually, I thought it was you that admitted that?