|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
MVP
Join Date: Sep 2000
Casino cash: $10005036
|
Quote:
No we'd be better off just taking the best available QB. You'd either hit and be eligible for a SB down the road, or you'd whiff and come back in 3-4 years and take another QB. |
|
Posts: 5,747
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
In Search of a Life
Join Date: Mar 2007
Casino cash: $6654388
|
My original post said "if you have the QB" then the position doesn't matter, take the highest graded player.
__________________
Mismanaging the clock. |
Posts: 22,541
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Immanentize The Eschaton
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In Partibus Infidelium
Casino cash: $-1044120
|
It's not that simple. You have to look at "bang for your buck" in the draft. The #1 guy in a position of lesser impact isn't going to help you as much as the #2 or even #3 guy in a position of greater impact.
|
Posts: 56,879
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() ![]() |
|
|