Are you all going to freak out

[BigMeatballDave]

The BCS will be proven to be a ****ing joke if Florida gets in.

Winning your conference should be required.

[tk13]

Originally Posted by Dave

The BCS will be proven to be a ****ing joke if Florida gets in.

Winning your conference should be required.

The funny thing is if ND loses and it's a bunch of 1-loss teams... I think you could argue Florida has the best resume of any of them, even though they are probably not one of the two best teams.

[BigMeatballDave]

Originally Posted by tk13

The funny thing is if ND loses and it's a bunch of 1-loss teams... I think you could argue Florida has the best resume of any of them, even though they are probably not one of the two best teams.

It makes absolutely no sense to me to be allowed to play for the NC without winning your conference.

I realize ND is not in a conference, so making it an official NCAA rule would not fly.

ND needs to stop being a ****ing douche and join a conference.

[DaKCMan AP]

Originally Posted by Dave

It makes absolutely no sense to me to be allowed to play for the NC without winning your conference.

I realize ND is not in a conference, so making it an official NCAA rule would not fly.

ND needs to stop being a ****ing douche and join a conference.

It's a pretty simple concept. It depends whether you think the NC should be played by the best 2 teams in the country or whether it should be the best two teams from different conferences. IMO, the best 2 teams, regardless of conference, should play for the NC.

When 6 of the top-10 teams are from a single conference and no other conference has more than 1 top-10 team, it's a pretty weak statement to claim "WELL WELL WELL YOU DIDN'T EVEN WIN YOUR CONFERENCE! DURRRRRRRR" when the other conferences are MUCH easier to win.

[chiefzilla1501]

Originally Posted by DaKCMan AP

It's a pretty simple concept. It depends whether you think the NC should be played by the best 2 teams in the country or whether it should be the best two teams from different conferences. IMO, the best 2 teams, regardless of conference, should play for the NC.

When 6 of the top-10 teams are from a single conference and no other conference has more than 1 top-10 team, it's a pretty weak statement to claim "WELL WELL WELL YOU DIDN'T EVEN WIN YOUR CONFERENCE! DURRRRRRRR" when the other conferences are MUCH easier to win.

This is the same dumb logic that would suggest that the AFC doesn't deserve to be in the Super Bowl because they are playing inferior to the NFC this year. Or the same dumb logic that would suggest that the entire decade from 2000-2010, the Yankees should have played the Red Sox in the world series every year.

The best two teams don't always play in championship games. In college football, there are too few games, and half of those games or more are against shitty competition. The ONLY way to compare two teams is if they are in the same conference. For a sport that already relies too heavily on opinion, why in the world would you take away the only tiebreaker that's truly objective?

[DaKCMan AP]

Originally Posted by tk13

The funny thing is if ND loses and it's a bunch of 1-loss teams... I think you could argue Florida has the best resume of any of them, even though they are probably not one of the two best teams.

If Florida beats Florida State they'd have an 11-1 record while playing the #1 schedule, three wins over top-10 teams, and the only loss to another top-10 team at a neutral site.